Then there is no issue, if you are also a PC gamer, then you must know that it doesn't take much to get games to work in 3D since you can easily install iZ3D drivers and make most games work in 3D with anaglyph glasses already.

I was strictly talking about the hardware to begin with anyway. Which imo requires more maintenance ( $) and can be higher cost for a basic system ( $) than most consoles typically are. I live in the US as well. But ultimately like I said, I choose PC version of multiplatform games over the console version, which is why my X360 has almost as much dust on it as my Wii. 

Wouldn't they be designing games with 3D in mind? If they are just 'slapping' on some render effects its even worse of a gimmick than I thought.

Neither of those are true. They are following this.

Nintendo is a disruptor, so the incumbents will either do a growth driven co-option (Microsoft) a defensive co-option (Sony) or cede the market.

If the game's world is modeled in 3D, stereoscopic 3D is as easy as making two different 2D projections of it, that's what your eyes do anyway. If the drivers are decently done and points of view and angles are correctly set, it shouldn't appear "slapped" on it, what could give a fake and cheesy effect is exaggerating angles and virtual cameras distance instead of using the natural average values of human eyes, to make the 3D effect stand out more, but it doesn't depend by design difficulties, just by a wrong choice of parameters. Obviously you don't just need the drivers, but that the game uses them, but anyway is a very final stage, the 3D game world is "upriver" of its rendering, with 2D you just take a 2D projection of it, with stereoscopic 3D you take 2 of them, all you need is just more computing power, a little more in the CPU, roughly double in the GPU if you want to keep the same resolution, detail and polygon count.

OTOH holographic 3D will require a very bigger amount of memory and computing power, but we are still very far away from it, and it won't be compatible with current techs.

omg, there is still hope =)

A 007 kirby? now ive seen everything!

I suspect that Nintendo will still be the frontier unless 3rd parties are really throwing in resources this time around, we'll find out about a year or two in the life cycle, I think it looks promising personally.

a PC isn't only for games though, before I got all new parts for my current machine, the last time I did any real upgrade was 5 years before and maybe a new video card every 3 years at a non prime price. Granted that a PC will cost more, the much cheaper prices of games in the long run and a lot more functions to use it for is the real value of a PC, best part is you don't worry about backwards compatibility with most games these days as people can still play games even from the DOS days. I say sell the 360 and Wii if they are collecting so much dust =P. I sold the 360 personally and I don't regret it at all.

You can't go up when your 1st.