If quality is really a factor to achieve higher sell than the rest, then explain Twilight.

Your argument about Sony not making the best games as evident by them not selling the best only makes sense in a world where the consumer is perfectly informed and gets to try every single game before buying.  Which is a world we don't live in.

Never saw it. Inflation?

but the point was to give credit to Sony for developing great games, and you can't give them credit for titles that they didn't develop.

It makes sense in this world. People are not as ill informed as has been spread across the web( at least in the case of gaming). The same box used to marginalize gamers i e casual gamers, hardcore gamers, etc. is just an attempt to try to explain why Wii's success is meaningless.

I mean, in that case, I could just say the GC was a better quality system than the PS2, but the ill informed consumer wasn't informed enough to understand that. That's bogus. Consumers like what the like and vote with their wallets. That's always been the case. When the PS1 was king, I remember Nintendo spouting "quality over quantity" when Wii is king, I hear sony spouting "quality over quantity'.  

Well, a lot of people find it great. Case closed.

I agree? Nope. But like people said, it's subjective.

i'm annoyed by the quality argument.

please tell me what is not quality about nintendo games?

i can't think of any bugs, glitches, bad gameplay, camara issues, ect. for their games.  Why is mario kart not a quality game?  What makes these sony games mores quality than twilight princess, mario galaxy 1 & 2, metroid prime series, mario kart, new mario, ect.

What is wrong with them, why are they not quality games?  Or so you don't respond with they are quality games, just not as high quality as sony, what makes Sony's games HIGHER Quality than those? 

Or are we basing quality purely on your own personal preferences?  Or is mario kart actually just as high quality or more than killzone 2, but you just like shooters more than racers?

No, you weren't but you and some others seemed to be confused about what is a first, second and third party game.

I see where you are coming from though.  When it comes to second party games, it becomes difficult to draw the line since even if Sony isn't developing the game per se, they still have their say in just about every aspect of the production.  If something doesn't meet their vision, or quality standards, then the second party has to work on the different aspects that are being pointed out until it reaches Sony's wanted quality level.

Making the whole thing pretty much the same, in the end, as any other first party game. 

But if Insomniac is anything to go by, it seems like Sony is giving a crapload of liberty to their second parties...

This

LoL ; )