By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Halo: Reach - 10 Weeks Today

 

Halo: Reach - 10 Weeks Today

Under 3 lolz I'm a troll 11 9.91%
 
3 9 8.11%
 
4 37 33.33%
 
5 26 23.42%
 
6 8 7.21%
 
6 Plus 20 18.02%
 
Total:111
WilliamWatts on 05 July 2010
Carl2291 said:

3 - 4

I went for 3.

If it was called Halo 4, then i would have gone 4 - 5.

I find it hard to believe that one million people would be that stupid.



Around the Network
Attoyou on 05 July 2010

 5plus Easy. 6 is Very possible.



Atto Suggests...:

Book - Malazan Book of the Fallen series 

Game - Metro Last Light

TV - Deadwood

Music - Forest Swords 

iWarMachine on 05 July 2010

i'll say....4M



I'm Back! - Proud owner of the best doomed handheld of all time!

Carl on 06 July 2010
Seece said:
Carl2291 said:

3 - 4

I went for 3.

If it was called Halo 4, then i would have gone 4 - 5.


Not a surprise ^^

What isn't?

@William Watts

ODST and even Wars are proof that a Halo that isn't numbered doesn't sell as well as a numbered Halo. Maybe Reach will break that trend... Who knows.



                            

Barozi on 06 July 2010

4.5m

 

oh wait that is not an option....



Around the Network
Barozi on 06 July 2010
Carl2291 said:
Seece said:
Carl2291 said:

3 - 4

I went for 3.

If it was called Halo 4, then i would have gone 4 - 5.


Not a surprise ^^

What isn't?

@William Watts

ODST and even Wars are proof that a Halo that isn't numbered doesn't sell as well as a numbered Halo. Maybe Reach will break that trend... Who knows.

You hopefully know how flawed that argument ist.



Carl on 06 July 2010
Barozi said:
Carl2291 said:
Seece said:
Carl2291 said:

3 - 4

I went for 3.

If it was called Halo 4, then i would have gone 4 - 5.


Not a surprise ^^

What isn't?

@William Watts

ODST and even Wars are proof that a Halo that isn't numbered doesn't sell as well as a numbered Halo. Maybe Reach will break that trend... Who knows.

You hopefully know how flawed that argument ist.

Wars, yes. ODST, no.



                            

Phobos on 06 July 2010

What were the preorders for Halo3 ten weeks before launch?

 

I say 4.5 mio first week.



 

 

"In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value..."

 

Alan Greenspan, 1967

Joel12345 on 06 July 2010
Seece said:
dtewi said:

Halo 3 had almost 4 million first week and ODST around 2-3 million.

I'd say maybe 4-5 million for this one. 6 plus is just crazy, I doubt it would do that.

Yeah, what I find most crazy is looking back and seeing nearly a 3rd of the userbase buy Halo 3 first week, if those people buy it, and a couple more million from the 30 million new buyers since then, 6 mill.

I think 5.2, but my range is 4.7 - 5.2


thats because the only reason people were buying the 360 was to play halo 3 :P



Barozi on 06 July 2010
Carl2291 said:
Barozi said:
Carl2291 said:
Seece said:
Carl2291 said:

3 - 4

I went for 3.

If it was called Halo 4, then i would have gone 4 - 5.


Not a surprise ^^

What isn't?

@William Watts

ODST and even Wars are proof that a Halo that isn't numbered doesn't sell as well as a numbered Halo. Maybe Reach will break that trend... Who knows.

You hopefully know how flawed that argument ist.

Wars, yes. ODST, no


Let's just say because it has the same multiplayer as Halo 3 except for 1 extra mode and one mappack and it had a short campaign without any Spartans.

It was meant to be an expansion and then after adding more content it was made into a standalone game.

Still worlds apart from a new Halo release.