By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales Discussion - Its time to admit it. PS3 will NEVER overtake 360.

the_lonely_gamer_123 said:

Well, I'd hate to admit it, the PS3 is almost certain to finish 3rd now, unless if Kinect bombs and if GT5 moves like 4-5 million consoles. Which could happen...


Except for every console GT5 moves, Halo Reach is bound to move 1 (or 2) as well.



Around the Network
Fumanchu said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:


MS in total have made a loss of $9.5billion and recovered only around $300m last year which brings it down to $9.2 billion loss

fisical year 2009-2010 has not taken into consideration

those neogaf figure are not correct.i have seen a  bigger list

 

so now we have $9.2billion substract profit from FY09-10

so $5.7b will not fetch them a profit on XBOX

 

also nobody would pay even $5.7BILLION to MS because of the following:

console business requires alot of  investment

the brand has to be relaunched every 5-6 years

also alot os XBOX hardcore fanbase is because of MS itself,so some fans will stop buying it

XBOX brand is not succesful even after spending so much as they are still fighting for 2nd place and nowhere near 1st

XBOX 720 would lose again if PS4,Wii2 drops at $299 OR something around that

The Neogaf reports are all I've seen - could you please link the 9.5billion loss report?

EDIT: I found this link - http://gamerinvestments.com/video-game-stocks/index.php/2010/06/28/state-of-the-video-game-console-war/


just google the results from the first XBOX and you will find a cumulative $9.5BILLION loss on XBOX division.

it would be even more as XBOX division is not alone and has alot of other products whose sales  lower the loss on XBOX



DarkisWR said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
Mr Puggsly said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
Mr Puggsly said:

The problem is you're looking at the Xbox 360 Arcade. But the masses clearly want the Elite and its still $300. A price cut on the Elite will definitely boost sales. And a $99 Arcade wouldn't hurt sales either.

THE MASSES clearly want Elite..........................Lmao

the hardcores want elite not the people who bought 360 because it was cheaper.

the price cut of Elite will help but not for the masses and only hardcores who care about elite

the $99 Arcade won't hurt but it would do a big impact either and the way MS is going,tey won't cut Arcade's price to $99

 

Kinect will have a much bigger impact than the Move. The Move is far too similar to the Wiimote.

Kinect will also have a BIGGER price

and this is just your prediction.nobody has any idea how they both will sell.All the NATAL/KINECT hype died down after the dissapointing MS E3 conference

Well the Wii has very similar motion controls as the PS3. Perhaps some competition there?

you weren't talking about the Wii motion control and its price

and the Wii motion control has already made its impact.and you are fogetting that PS3 has Motion control in HD

You living in the past or something? MS has big things coming now.

????????????????????????

so you just discard everything that happened in the past?

and you were the one who said MS always counters SONY which its didn't do last year



Everyone wants the Elite. People might settle with the Arcade because of price, but the masses want the Elite. So when it hits $200 you can expect a huge sales boost. Especially if MS does the price cut before Sony.

no the masses don't care about elit,they care about the games whihc are playable on Arcade.

yes $200 will have a big boost but not as big as you think as people already have ARCADE's

Also, I think a $99 Arcade will be huge. I just noticed the Gamecube saw its best sales at $99. The Original Xbox saw its best sales when it went under $200. Almost 50% was sold at $149. I think the 360 will follow suit.

$99 arcade would be big but MS won't do it for now and if they do $149 first and then $99 then it won't have much boost.

Gamecube had its best sales at $99 but it wasn't selling at a higher price thats why.and even XBOX wasn't selling at the higher price and that the entire generation was low priced.

this generation has been high priced and even then people bought the console,it isn't that just because of the lower price people will buy 2-3 360'S

Do the math. The Move starter kit is $99. The navigation controller is $30. Some games seem to require 2 Move controllers. That'll be another $50 for that experience. And if you want to play multiplayer, you'll need more Move controllers.

you can use DS3 as NAV

I don't need to buy MOVE STARTER bundle as i already have an EYE.

Only one MOVE

and those some games requiring 2 MOVE controller will be rare so don't push it

And for the game,i am already buying LBP,SOCOM,SORCERY,KILLZONE so why should i buy it

Multiplayer is your problem as nobody in my home plays so i won't need more controllers.also like Wii people will buy more controllers

also KINECT can't take more than 2 people at a time

 

so thats just $40 for a MOVE controller as i will be buying in Europe where it is cheaper and it will be more discounted on sites like AMAZON


The Kinect on the other hand will most likely be under $150. My guess is more like $120. And you don't need any more accessories and multiplayer can be played on a single device. The Kinect seems like a bargain in comparison.

how is it a bargain?????????? 

also don't forget that MOVE will have alot more games and better ones for all genres

also MOVE price was  affected by MS disappointing conference.

MOVE is cheaper in EU,JAPAN and

MOVE can also get a price cut as it costs alot less that its price to make


Well I'm just saying the Wii can still have a negative impact on PS3 sales. Especially considering their motion devices are very much the same.

the impact will be no greater than current one MOVE can only benefit


Well did they really need to counteract immediately? The Xbox 360 had huge sales last year. They are still millions ahead of the PS3. Most importantly the 360 was likely sold at a profit. We know Sony was taking a hit for each PS3 sold.

they are still 5million ahead even after being cheaper

yes 360 had huge sales but not bigger than PS3

how is it important that 360 was making a profit when we are discussing sales,stop bullshiting


Now its 2010. The 360 Slim has been released with no price and its selling like hot cakes.

you are talking as if 360 has been selling like hotcakes whole of 2010 till now.............lol

its just been 2 weeks and we don't know if it will continue

and about 360 SLIM hotcakes,we don't know what is selling like hotcakes the discounted ARCADE and ELITES or the SLIM.

The Kinect is coming and its getting a lot of attention (unlike the Move).

almost all NATAL hype died down this E3 after KINECT name and MS horrible conference

Reach is coming and that'll generate ungodly amounts of money along with Xbox Live Gold subscriptions.

REACH releasing doesn't mean XBL money will be made

do you even know how a game makes money

I also expect a sales boost when the 360 Slim Arcade gets released.

we will see when that happens

Unless Sony gots another price cut up its sleeve or actually releases GT5, I don't know what else they can do to combat MS in the near future.

SONY will only do a price cut if SLIM,KINECT,360 price cut makes an impact 

GT5 dropping November.you should follow gaming




Do you ever stop?

You've trashed this thread more than a lil bit.

Sorry but your stealth trolling and like last time I'm sure you'll post on my wall talking bs and have me banned for a week. *which in turn had you banned for a week aswell...ironic eh*

Your adding nothing to this discussion...infact I will say YOUr ATTACKING other users who do not support the ps3 blindly and anyone who has a differing opinion to you....if you don't think soo..you quote soo much you can't even quote correctly anymore...your post are a train wreck.

 

BTW last time I checked...theres more than just GT-Recycle for gamers.* I luv Gt as much as the next guy...but until i have it in my hand and see it for myself..it's all hype...been done for the last 10 years...when I see a ss that has n64 tree's and then e3 i see ''gameplay'' that has photorealistic qualitys...I call ''bs''.

 

Spew your unfounded and confusing points all you want.

 

 

BTW last time I owned you about kinect vs move pricing..you kindly hit the report button on every single post I made.

 

You attack user's waaay too much here and I emplore a real mod to set you straight.

WTF are you talking about????????????????



Solid_Snake4RD said:
Fumanchu said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:


...

The Neogaf reports are all I've seen - could you please link the 9.5billion loss report?

EDIT: I found this link - http://gamerinvestments.com/video-game-stocks/index.php/2010/06/28/state-of-the-video-game-console-war/


just google the results from the first XBOX and you will find a cumulative $9.5BILLION loss on XBOX division.

it would be even more as XBOX division is not alone and has alot of other products whose sales  lower the loss on XBOX

So you are telling us that the finantial reports that Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo provide are false, and your numbers are correct? Because that graph is made with those financial reports. Please provide us where you can find those numbers that you mention.



Mr Puggsly said:

Unless we can find the sales difference between Arcade and Elite units, no point in debating this.

yeah

but you started the debate

and people who normally bought 360 because it was cheaper weren't hardcores and gdon't care about ELITE's

I agree $149 is more likely to happen first. I also think it'll have massive sales boost at that price. I expect another huge boost if they can manage to get it down to $99. I don't think the original Xbox went under $149 though.

obviosly their would be a boost for every price cut but will it be like the PS3 boost last year and sustaining,no it won't comparing to that

Gamecube had its best sales at $99 but it wasn't selling at a higher price thats why.and even XBOX wasn't selling at the higher price and that the entire generation was low priced.

this generation has been high priced and even then people bought the console,it isn't that just because of the lower price people will buy 2-3 360'S

Well there has been a great demand for the Xbox 360 at the current high price, and there will be an even bigger demand at lower prices as long as it keeps receiving quality software.

their has been demand for 360 at high price??????????????

ARCADE was cheaper than the Wii Last year and now too

That sounds comfortable. I think people rather use a Nav controller.

yes but atleast it is no compulsary

I'm looking at the big picture. Not just what you have.

yes me too

but people who want will buy

Well if you want to experience those games you better have another Move controller lying around. The Kinect won't have that problem. No extra cost to play with a friend either.

you can get the full experience with one controller same like Wii

and no extra cost on Kinect will also be costlier and bad games and when a normal gamer goes to buy a game,he does not think of playing multiplayer in-house

Once again, I'm looking at the big picture. You're just telling me why this isn't your problem.

big picture is different for everybody

Maybe it only supports 2 people, maybe it doesn't. All I know is buying two move controllers and an Eyetoy isn't cheap either. Especially when you have to buy Nav controllers.

not everybody needs to buy 2 MOVE and NAV,it depends on your choice and most won't even use Kinect for 2 people

Once again, you keep focusing on yourself. It'll take more than you to make the Move a success.

yes but you are talking as if everybody will need to buy 2 MOVE,NAV compulsary and that everybody will play multiplayer in-house which all depends on the person and people do buy exta things all the time for the Wii

Because buying everything for Move isn't cheap. Especially for multiplayer gaming.

not everybody is going to do it and if you want to do just buy an additional controller as again people buying don't think of playing multiplayer in-house and if they want like Wii pay additional and the price is only for you

I doubt it. The Kinect has potential you can't get on the Move and vice versa. I mean its full body tracking vs a Wiimote knockoff.

how is Kinect more potential.its games are limited by 360's processing power and don't forget Kinect is Eyetoy knockoff by your going

Uhhh... first one is an opinion, second is true, and I think you just pulled the third out of your ass.

MS conference was dispointing and if you liked it you  are an exception

and if you think MOVE costs alot more than DS3 and near its $50 PRICE then you don't follow gaming

Well I think being so similar to the Wiimote may deter some people. They basically already experienced it.

yes but the gaming experiences will be much deeper whereas on KINECT it will be like Wii,talking about the games quality not how they interact

Sorry, I was under the illusion that profit is important for some reason. Anyhow, I made my point why they didn't need to counteract immediately.

profit is important but not when we were talking about sales.how did it even help when you were comparing sales

I didn't make the claim. But sales are relatively the same as last year which was great. I expect a big holiday as well.

you didn't make the claim but you were talking that way

I'd like to think a $50 price cut on an obsolete model made that much of an impact. But I doubt it.

obsolete models??????????????????-they still do all the things except Wifi

if you are saying that the $50 price cut didn't make an impact then your earlier comments that $99 price cut will make impact are bullish

I disagree, but its still getting a lot more attention than the Move.

its noty getting anywhere near as much attention as it was getting earlier

and the current KINECT attention is more about predicting its price and people bashing it nothing else

Of course it does. It'll be a major reason people sign up and renew for XBL Gold.

like people wouldn't normally nenew XBL GOLD membership,i don't think the renewal can be counted as new revenue as MS would normally be expecting it

andf about new XBL memberships,they would make it but not loads as not many more will signup for HALO

From the game itself being, DLC for Reach will be huge, and XBL Gold generates money I imagine.

the game itself is normal,its nothing new

DLC for games is normal nothing new

XBL LIVE,renewal is not a new thing and new memberships will not be so much

Yes, you'll definitely see a boost when it happens.

yeah till that lay low

Can Sony afford to do a price cut so soon though? We'll have to wait and see I guess.

SONY can do a $50 price cut and they can afford it

 

Sorry I'm not following a game I really don't care about. I just noticed this site hasn't posted the release date.

just because this site hasn't posted the date so you don't know?

its one of the biggest games,if you don't know its release date then you don't follow gamig much and are one of the casual gamers





Around the Network
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
Squilliam said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
Squilliam said:
thismeintiel said:
Mr Puggsly said:
M.U.G.E.N said:

ps3 doomed? again? :S man that sounds familiar

I still say its doomed. I mean just bearing in mind its a horrible financial failure.

Well, if you're going to go with that as the standard for what a doomed console is, then I guess the 360 is doomed, as well.  It still hasn't come close to making back the billions lost from the original X-Box or the billions lost from its own first years of being on the market.  So far, the X-Box brand has yet to be profitable.  Something that has led some of MS's investors to cry out for them to drop out of the console market and put more focus on maintaining its OS marketshare.  If Kinect proves not to be the success MS hoping for, you can expect to hear more investors crying out for the same thing.

At least on a positive for Sony, the Playstation brand, as a whole, has still remained profitable. 

http://neogaf.net/forum/showpost.php?p=19625436&postcount=90

The Playstation brand is barely above water, I suspect that a newer version of the above shows them at or below 0.

The EDD will probably poke its head above $1B profit for the financial year ending 2010. If you want to talk about it as a going concern then yes it'll take a while to break even. If you're talking about the Xbox business as an asset then its already paid itself back because it could be sold for more than they have lost thus far, netting them an overall profit. Further to that, they are getting better returns than simply leaving the cash in the bank. So whether Kinect does anything or not, they still have no reason to be specifically concerned about the Xbox 360 moving forward.

YOU THINK XBOX business can be sold for $9.5billion.only that amount will give MS a profit

No, I think it can be sold for more than $5.7B Because the last $312M profit wasn't accounted for and this quarter will probably give them about $100M profit overall so that link will read very differently in less than 30 days.

 




MS in total have made a loss of $9.5billion and recovered only around $300m last year which brings it down to $9.2 billion loss

fisical year 2009-2010 has not taken into consideration

those neogaf figure are not correct.i have seen a  bigger list

 

so now we have $9.2billion substract profit from FY09-10

so $5.7b will not fetch them a profit on XBOX

 

also nobody would pay even $5.7BILLION to MS because of the following:

console business requires alot of  investment

the brand has to be relaunched every 5-6 years

also alot os XBOX hardcore fanbase is because of MS itself,so some fans will stop buying it

XBOX brand is not succesful even after spending so much as they are still fighting for 2nd place and nowhere near 1st

XBOX 720 would lose again if PS4,Wii2 drops at $299 OR something around that



oops... wrong again huh?

so.. MS is sitting on $5.8Bn losses... which they can pretty much afford as it represents about 1/3 of their annual profits

Sony (despite their gaming dominance over the years) is sitting on cumulative losses of around $2bn.  

those two numbers will move closer togtehr over the next 2 years too.

i have seen in one of the charts as MS having $9.5b loss

and we weren't talking about MS being able to  afford it,we know it can easily

but squilliam was saying that MS could sell it and i was debating if any company would buy it or not

and that SONY loss will be easily covered by Blu-ray and PS4.$2B ISN'T much when its helping more products of the company



Kynes said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
Fumanchu said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:


...

The Neogaf reports are all I've seen - could you please link the 9.5billion loss report?

EDIT: I found this link - http://gamerinvestments.com/video-game-stocks/index.php/2010/06/28/state-of-the-video-game-console-war/


just google the results from the first XBOX and you will find a cumulative $9.5BILLION loss on XBOX division.

it would be even more as XBOX division is not alone and has alot of other products whose sales  lower the loss on XBOX

So you are telling us that the finantial reports that Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo provide are false, and your numbers are correct? Because that graph is made with those financial reports. Please provide us where you can find those numbers that you mention.

no

i have seen another charts showing $9.5b loss for MS EDD division



mundus6 said:
the_lonely_gamer_123 said:

Well, I'd hate to admit it, the PS3 is almost certain to finish 3rd now, unless if Kinect bombs and if GT5 moves like 4-5 million consoles. Which could happen...


Except for every console GT5 moves, Halo Reach is bound to move 1 (or 2) as well.


halo reach won't move consoles *facepalm*



Killiana1a said:
Mr Puggsly said:
kowenicki said:



oops... wrong again huh?

so.. MS is sitting on $5.8Bn losses... which they can pretty much afford as it represents about 1/3 of their annual profits

Sony (despite their gaming dominance over the years) is sitting on cumulative losses of around $2bn.  

those two numbers will move closer togtehr over the next 2 years too.

Am I reading this chart right?

It seems the 360 could potentially be profitable by the end of this gen.

While Sony lost all the profits from the PS2 and then some.

If this is the case, then do you think Kaz Hirai and the execs above him at Sony are looking at this data and their internals and questioning whether it is a wise business decision to invest in creating a PS4?

have you gone bonkers

you think they didn't know that PS3 will make them a loss

they made the sacrifice for BLU-RAY,now Blu-ray and PS4 are their jackpot lines

Also, does anyone have any estimates on how much Move and Kinect have cost in terms of research, development, production, and marketing?

nobody knows this

Will the sales from Move and Kinect recuperate their initial start-up costs in order to be considered a profitable business venture, thus a good business decision?

yes as costs will be minimal





mundus6 said:
the_lonely_gamer_123 said:

Well, I'd hate to admit it, the PS3 is almost certain to finish 3rd now, unless if Kinect bombs and if GT5 moves like 4-5 million consoles. Which could happen...


Except for every console GT5 moves, Halo Reach is bound to move 1 (or 2) as well.


have you gone bonkers?

you think HALO fans who already bought 360 will rebuy for HALO REACH

GT5 is the first GT full game so it will move consoles