By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - New inFAMOUS 2 screenshots look sexy !

EncodedNybble said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:

 

Click to view larger....am I really the only person who doesn't mind Cole's new look ? he looks like Nathan Drake !


Yes, yes you are.  I don't mind them as a general concept if that is the way the character was conceived, but it wasn't.  Cole already looked a certain way.  Unless they magically pull some time travel/he as warped by his powers/some random plot point in to explain why he looks that way, it is a HUGE disconnect with already existing lore and it is jarring to a lot of people (myself included).

 

What if in Empire Strikes Back Vader was instead skinny, wore white, didn't have the helmet and was played by Steve Martin, that wouldn't seem weird to you?

Difference is, Vader was an interesting character with universal appeal. Cole from inFAMOUS 1 was pretty boring for me anyway....

People who like Uncharted say in forums (not just VGC) that Nathan Drake is awesome...People who like God of War think Kratos is badass.

But people who comment on inFAMOUS say that the game is awesome...very rarely have I seen them say "Cole is awesome !"...Its the same with Sev and Killzone 2.

Who knows, you might end up liking the new Cole when you actually play the game.

Its not like his re-design is gonna make you not buy the game, is it ?



Around the Network

He looks like an average college white boy.



They have drakefied him, thats not a bad thing to do though.



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

EncodedNybble said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:

 

Click to view larger....am I really the only person who doesn't mind Cole's new look ? he looks like Nathan Drake !


Yes, yes you are.  I don't mind them as a general concept if that is the way the character was conceived, but it wasn't.  Cole already looked a certain way.  Unless they magically pull some time travel/he as warped by his powers/some random plot point in to explain why he looks that way, it is a HUGE disconnect with already existing lore and it is jarring to a lot of people (myself included).

 

What if in Empire Strikes Back Vader was instead skinny, wore white, didn't have the helmet and was played by Steve Martin, that wouldn't seem weird to you?

i like this one better



“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”

- George Orwell, ‘1984’

They really kicked the graphics up a notch.



ǝןdɯıs ʇı dǝǝʞ oʇ ǝʞıן ı ʍouʞ noʎ 

Ask me about being an elitist jerk

Time for hype

Around the Network
Porcupine_I said:
EncodedNybble said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:

 

Click to view larger....am I really the only person who doesn't mind Cole's new look ? he looks like Nathan Drake !


Yes, yes you are.  I don't mind them as a general concept if that is the way the character was conceived, but it wasn't.  Cole already looked a certain way.  Unless they magically pull some time travel/he as warped by his powers/some random plot point in to explain why he looks that way, it is a HUGE disconnect with already existing lore and it is jarring to a lot of people (myself included).

 

What if in Empire Strikes Back Vader was instead skinny, wore white, didn't have the helmet and was played by Steve Martin, that wouldn't seem weird to you?

i like this one better



LOL Dark Helmet....  I love that movie.



I really don't see why people were so attached to inFamous 1's Cole. He was ugly, his voice was more gravelly than Batman, he had no personality whatsoever, his animation was terrible, and he looked plain ridiculous when he became evil.

inFamous 2's Cole looks much better. I don't care if he isn't a regular human with superpowers. He's actually a semi-decent character this time around.



(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective

Kantor said:

I really don't see why people were so attached to inFamous 1's Cole. He was ugly, his voice was more gravelly than Batman, he had no personality whatsoever, his animation was terrible, and he looked plain ridiculous when he became evil.

inFamous 2's Cole looks much better. I don't care if he isn't a regular human with superpowers. He's actually a semi-decent character this time around.

A don't know about Cole but I did care about the story in the original.  As long as the story stays interesting in inFamous 2, I am sold.  They changed like two characters that's it.  Xenosaga changed art directions every game.



Kantor said:

I really don't see why people were so attached to inFamous 1's Cole. He was ugly, his voice was more gravelly than Batman, he had no personality whatsoever, his animation was terrible, and he looked plain ridiculous when he became evil.

inFamous 2's Cole looks much better. I don't care if he isn't a regular human with superpowers. He's actually a semi-decent character this time around.


I thought the VA in inFAMOUS was great and he did have personality (this one might too, who knows).  The animation could have been better but that's not really the issue.

 

If they cleaned up the animation, improved graphics etc, that's understandable.  I mean they changed mario from SMB -> Mario Galaxy but it is still Mario.  He still had the same basic shape, hat, etc.  They made him a little more round, but overall, still mario and anyone could tell.

 

If I showed you a screen shot of this "new" Cole without telling you it was Infamous 2 and the screen shot didn't involve lightning, and asked "Which character is this from a PS3 exclusive?"  I doubt you'd say Cole MacGrath.  That is the issue, it's just not the same character.  He may be a better character, who knows, but it's not the same character and that is a large disconnect to me.  I preordered the original, I don't think I'll even buy this one (I'm serious) unless they give some reason plot wise (that isn't lame) why the look changed.



The game does look good though. They seemed to have upped the graphics quite a bit.