By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Amazing Crysis 2 images. Simply amazing.

selnor on 19 June 2010
boilermaker11 said:
Dallinor said:
selnor said:
leo-j said:

everything they have shown was from the 360 version of CRYSIS 2

also look at RAGE on 360.. that is high up there in graphics.. like almost Uncharted 2 high up there

 

What? Stop with the PS3 Exclusive tone. Thats so last year. 

Crysis 2, Bulletstorm, Rage all beat Uncharted 2 easily. 

Come to think of it now games are all looking so good it's stupid to call anything better than anything else.

Vanquish, Rage, Bulletstorm, KZ3, Gears 3, Crysis 2, Reach, Enslaved to name a few are all amazing beyond anything out now in game engine. Some of these games are throwing around huge scale and masses of onscreen action with loads of particles and effects. 

It's pointless to say anything is better than anything else. Crysis 2 sits atop. But there is nothing between the rest. They all beat existing games IMO. 

This notion of PS3 can only do it. Has been compleely nullified by 5 multiplat games and 2 exclusive 360 games showing it plays in exactly the same ballpark as PS3. If anything this E3 showed that significantly. 

You can add Brink to those games to. 6 multiplats. 

And we are yet to see another definate contender Cryteks Kingdoms.

You should have just bought a PS3, or stuck to the PC, then you wouldn't need to keep championing the 360 in an area it's been the underdog for most of this gen selnor.

Bulletstorm has better graphics then Uncharted 2? Do you actually even believe that? From what I've seen the game would have to undergo a massive graphics overhaul before launch to even be in the same league as Uncharted 2. The same goes for Vanquish and Enslaved, while beautiful (not so sure about that in the case of Vanquish) they're not graphics king contenders by any means.

I've said it before in the past: Selnor just wants some game, ANY game that's on the 360 to look better than top PS3 exclusives. He used to say Lost Planet 2 was "graphics king"....

And what's worse is that "This notion that 'PS3 can only do it' has been nullified by 5 multiplats"...is based on complete bullshots. Otherwise, GT5 completely murks everything known to man =/. You think those shots of Vanquish are in game? Gears 3 is on the Unreal Engine...while good looking, time and time again it's shown that's its outdated. And I saw that in game render of Crysis 2 in 'The Wall' trailer in 1080p. Looked no better than an Unreal game. 

Stop. Your looking desperate. PS3 exclusives this E3 were not graphically above other games. 

PS3 fans are looking desperate. I am basing what I said off of more than 40 minutes of combined footage. 



Around the Network
selnor on 19 June 2010
Skeeuk said:
selnor said:
leatherhat said:
leo-j said:

it isn't tiny selnor.. stop trying to make KZ3 look bad


I'm gonna have to recommend not arguing with selnor. Its pointless.


I'm not arguing. I'm saying in comparison, the play areas and enemy count is significantly less. It's right there on the screen. 

there was only the oil rig scene shown the reason why it was enclosed is because thats how that scene is played out.

you have to wait till full game to see which has better grafix, KZ3 beats crysis 2 for now and will do upon releases of both games.

Cmon. it's not technically on the same level.



shanbcn on 19 June 2010

Killzone 3: This may very well be the best looking game ever -- and it's even better in 3D.

 

http://www.1up.com/do/minisite?cId=3179986

Nothing come close to KZ3.



krimoz911 on 19 June 2010

But I though Alan Wake was to be the new graphics king after uncharted 2.



"Kinect" Games I am really excited about (Click for videos)

               Kinectimals        Dance Central      Kinect-Sports   Kinect-Adventures    Your Shape       Kinect-Forza

Owner of :   slim 1000 +  80GB DSlite

shanbcn on 19 June 2010

Rage with pre backed lighting fall short off Killzone 3.



Around the Network
Munkeh111 on 19 June 2010

This is when it really hurts to not have a graphics card (its broken and I am getting a new PC soon) so I can't play full screen video, so just stick some on the store Sony and M$!



Booh! on 19 June 2010

Well, Killzone 2 is quite better than Crysis, so I'm fairly sure that Killzone 3 will look better than Crysis 2. However I find really, really, really pointless to talk about the graphics of games that are not out yet. I'm looking forward for Rage and GT5.



selnor on 19 June 2010
shanbcn said:

Rage with pre backed lighting fall short off Killzone 3.

First pont. 

Kilzone 3 - 30fps

Rage - '60 FPS'

I would love to see Killzone 3 at double the frame rate.

 

Easily one of the best looking video game I've seen so far at E3 2010.

Rage blew me with its rich, vibrant settings powered by id's new graphics engine. Oddly enough, for a game rife with gore and killing, what made the biggest impression on me wasn't the action or the violence but the gorgeous, "hand-crafted" environments that Rage creative director Tim Willits was enthusiastic about showing off to the audience. The tremendous level of detail on Rage's settings is emphasized by the game's powerful id Tech 5 engine. The Dead City, which is essentially a giant pile of collapsed skyscrapers, road signs, and concrete debris, was particularly impressive.

http://www.gamepro.com/article/previews/215558/e3-2010-rage/

 

The long development time for Rage seems to be worthwhile. The new video footage from E3 2010 can be more than excellent. Rage is a top candidate for the title "graphic-Hammer."

http://translate.google.de/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&layout=1&eotf=1&u=http://www.cynamite.com/Rage-PS3-205557/News/Rage-Neue-Screenshots-des-id-Grafikhammers-Update-Fuenfminuetige-Live-Demo-von-der-E3-2010-742718/&sl=de&tl=en

We've seen and written about Rage  in the past, and many of the gameplay elements on display were repeat showings. Things like vehicular combat, a wicked bladed boomerang, and item scavenging were quickly shown to refresh everybody's memories, or get them up to speed. During this time, all I could do was sit back and marvel at the graphics. Rage is easily one of the best looking games I've seen, even with the entirety of 2010 left as development time for id to further polish it. The crazy part? The demo was shown on an Xbox 360 and id was happy to point out that the ''CURRENT'' PS3 version was running even more smoothly. 

http://uk.xbox360.ign.com/articles/108/1087379p1.html



Necromunda on 19 June 2010

Okay, someone seriously needs to embed a video interview of RAGE...

Might as well be me ^_^ And might I add, this is easily one of my most anticipated games.



selnor on 19 June 2010
CGI-Quality said:

Looking at Crysis 2 (at least the console footage) it's not impressing me quite like the original did, in fact, not even close. That said, it DOES look good, nothing short of it.

To the Rage vs KZ3/Crysis 2 talk, I still think Killzone 3 may have the edge when all is said and done. From what I've seen of all of them, I think KZ3 still edges out the win, but Rage looks fantastic and Crysis 2 is right behind it. Rage will likely top them both with textures, Crysis 2 will probably top the others with colors, but Killzone 3 will have the overall prowess to pull off the win, I think. Of course it's exclusivity will play a major role, but it is what it is.

Crysis 2 and Rage will win on massive environments. All the previews as well say a enemy appeared before the end of the 20 min demo of Rage that was about the same size as the big ones from GOW3. 0.0

Worth noting to is Crysis 2's full destruction. Again worth noting is that Rage is running double the framerate of both Crysis 2 and Killzone 3. 

None of the above games have as high a enemy count as Halo Reach, but KZ3 only impressed me for the water. And it was beautiful water. But the rest was very good. Just not Rage or Crysis 2 good.

Also worth noting is Crysis 2 is the only game of the above doing everything in full realtime.