Rainbird said:
Lol. "You can do this, but nobody is gonna do it, so it's not possible. Pay up!" |
?
Rainbird said:
Lol. "You can do this, but nobody is gonna do it, so it's not possible. Pay up!" |
?
tuscaniman said:
|
You honestly don't think it sounds funny?
are you all forgetting nvidia 3d vision is cheap
Rainbird said:
You honestly don't think it sounds funny? |
Do I think what sounds funny? Holding a dualshock in one hand while waving the other? Yes I think that sounds funny.
tuscaniman said:
Do I think what sounds funny? Holding a dualshock in one hand while waving the other? Yes I think that sounds funny. |
Whatever, enjoy yourself.
Rainbird said:
Whatever, enjoy yourself. |
I will because I won't be wasting $500 in order for two people to play Move.
| Trentonater said: are you all forgetting nvidia 3d vision is cheap |
I wouldn't say it's cheap. If you have a PC with a powerful Nvidia card already then yes the costs come down but starting from scratch is pretty hefty. Plus, they still use the glasses and I think this is a barrier for 3D.
MS is right that 3d tech at home needs to drastically come down in price before the mass market will buy it.
Nov 2016 - NES outsells PS1 (JP)
Don't Play Stationary 4 ever. Switch!
3D in the console space wont be impactful until next gen. The cost of entry is just to high. In addition to the TV itself at this point my family would need to spend an extra $600 (minimum) on glasses. So he is correct in what he says.
As for the 3DS I will think about that once I know the price.
Its libraries that sell systems not a single game.
MS doesn't have a vested interest in pushing 3D televisions, so why would they care at this point about driving their sales, which is what Sony is doing with the PS3. MS will be able to churn out 3D content once the uptick in 3D televisions takes place.