By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Sony's E3 Shows Why PS3 Is King Of Exclusives

BBH on 15 June 2010
richardhutnik said:
BBH said:
Maynard_Tool said:

Mmmm ok, no matter what I say, your gonna still be saying that "Sony blew Nintendo" when in reality.... well, we all know what happened. Good luck with your thread man

Im BBH not BHR lol.

And that is such a cop out of an argument.

I'm always going to say Sony>Nintendo because I by far prefer their stuff, and the opposite is true for you. But you can't argue with the facts that show Sony is constantly pumping out loads of content for its users. How good that content is, is up to you to decide.

Since there is no truth and just opinion, I will say that Kirby's Epic Yarn and also Kinectimals BLOW AWAY every other game you describe.  Why?  Because apparently it is so blasted subjective, it doesn't matter what anyone else writes.  The former is made of yarn, and the second has terminal cuteness.  Yarn and cuteness > being AWESOMELY CORE!


Sure, idc about that.

But you can't deny the amount of games Sony delivers

...which is what we are talking about? lol



Around the Network
BHR-3 on 15 June 2010
ZenfoldorVGI said:

Think Nintendo blew Sony away, honestly, there wasn't a single thing to me that was a surprise that wasn't just as valid to another console, lol. Showcasing multiplats Means alot 360 use to show multis b/c there were developed for that console most multis are now using PS3 as lead  on sonys co.....and showing known games is not big news....and 3DS ROCKED, so did those new Nintendo games.  Id rather enjoy 3d games on a large screen that will give the effect of things popping out at me instead of depth of the screen I was very unimpressed with Sony and MS.

also for the others
http://meodia.com/article/229/so-who-won-e3-2010/



                                                             

                                                                      Play Me

BBH on 15 June 2010
Maynard_Tool said:
BBH said:
Maynard_Tool said:

Mmmm ok, no matter what I say, your gonna still be saying that "Sony blew Nintendo" when in reality.... well, we all know what happened. Good luck with your thread man

Im BBH not BHR lol.

And that is such a cop out of an argument.

I'm always going to say Sony>Nintendo because I by far prefer their stuff, and the opposite is true for you. But you can't argue with the facts that show Sony is constantly pumping out loads of content for its users. How good that content is, is up to you to decide.

Oh fuck hahahaha my bad, similar nicknames.

Well, if Sony> Nintendo always... then i have nothing else to say. For example, in 2008 I know Nintendo fucked up, they were the worst in E3. Like I said, if you watched the support for 3DS and the new games announced for the wii... i think is a no brainer.

 

Sony showed games that we knew they were coming. They have been living from GT5 for .... like the past 4 years. And just because they finally announced the release date it's a Boom? Come on.

 

but if Sony> Nintendo always... no matter what, then i guess this is over now xD

Sony>Nintendo always unless Nintendo comes out with an HD console, wit BluRay and my favourite games on it :)

Get my point? It's not being biased, or anything like that, it's just preferring what I prefer. 

Yea, Over lol.



superchunk on 15 June 2010
BBH said:


Sure, idc about that.

But you can't deny the amount of games Sony delivers

...which is what we are talking about? lol


Interesting. Because when I look at quantity and quality Nintendo still beats them as well as anyone else.

Top 10 saleswise on VGC is all Nintendo.
Most 1st party releases annually is all Nintendo.
Highest rated games on Metacritic for all time .. wait for it... is Nintendo.

I think you are basing fact off of your opinion. Nintendo publishes far more games than Sony and it does so with higher sales and better quality. Its just that they mostly don't appeal to you.



Maynard_Tool on 15 June 2010
BBH said:
Maynard_Tool said:
BBH said:
Maynard_Tool said:

Mmmm ok, no matter what I say, your gonna still be saying that "Sony blew Nintendo" when in reality.... well, we all know what happened. Good luck with your thread man

Im BBH not BHR lol.

And that is such a cop out of an argument.

I'm always going to say Sony>Nintendo because I by far prefer their stuff, and the opposite is true for you. But you can't argue with the facts that show Sony is constantly pumping out loads of content for its users. How good that content is, is up to you to decide.

Oh fuck hahahaha my bad, similar nicknames.

Well, if Sony> Nintendo always... then i have nothing else to say. For example, in 2008 I know Nintendo fucked up, they were the worst in E3. Like I said, if you watched the support for 3DS and the new games announced for the wii... i think is a no brainer.

 

Sony showed games that we knew they were coming. They have been living from GT5 for .... like the past 4 years. And just because they finally announced the release date it's a Boom? Come on.

 

but if Sony> Nintendo always... no matter what, then i guess this is over now xD

Sony>Nintendo always unless Nintendo comes out with an HD console, wit BluRay and my favourite games on it :)

Get my point? It's not being biased, or anything like that, it's just preferring what I prefer. 

Yea, Over lol.

Sure is not



03/10/09 HUGE day in my life:

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=63437&page=1

Around the Network
dahuman on 15 June 2010

It doesn't get much more uh... "hardcore...." than Kirby if you ask me but.....



dtewi on 15 June 2010
BBH said:
Maynard_Tool said:
BBH said:
Maynard_Tool said:

Mmmm ok, no matter what I say, your gonna still be saying that "Sony blew Nintendo" when in reality.... well, we all know what happened. Good luck with your thread man

Im BBH not BHR lol.

And that is such a cop out of an argument.

I'm always going to say Sony>Nintendo because I by far prefer their stuff, and the opposite is true for you. But you can't argue with the facts that show Sony is constantly pumping out loads of content for its users. How good that content is, is up to you to decide.

Oh fuck hahahaha my bad, similar nicknames.

Well, if Sony> Nintendo always... then i have nothing else to say. For example, in 2008 I know Nintendo fucked up, they were the worst in E3. Like I said, if you watched the support for 3DS and the new games announced for the wii... i think is a no brainer.

 

Sony showed games that we knew they were coming. They have been living from GT5 for .... like the past 4 years. And just because they finally announced the release date it's a Boom? Come on.

 

but if Sony> Nintendo always... no matter what, then i guess this is over now xD

Sony>Nintendo always unless Nintendo comes out with an HD console, wit BluRay and my favourite games on it :)

Get my point? It's not being biased, or anything like that, it's just preferring what I prefer. 

Yea, Over lol.


bias (buy-ous)

  • a partiality that prevents objective consideration of an issue or situation
Let's look at it objectively. Nintendo unveiled an enormous amount of exclusives that will be absolute quality. And according to their historic record, that proves it. Also, Nintendo games have garnered more praise and higher ratings than Sony games.
 
Ergo, Nintendo > Sony this E3 for the sheer insanity of their quality.



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

BBH on 15 June 2010
superchunk said:
BBH said:
 


Sure, idc about that.

But you can't deny the amount of games Sony delivers

...which is what we are talking about? lol


Interesting. Because when I look at quantity and quality Nintendo still beats them as well as anyone else.

Top 10 saleswise on VGC is all Nintendo.
Most 1st party releases annually is all Nintendo.
Highest rated games on Metacritic for all time .. wait for it... is Nintendo.

I think you are basing fact off of your opinion. Nintendo publishes far more games than Sony and it does so with higher sales and better quality. Its just that they mostly don't appeal to you.

I'd imagine the amount of Ninty releases in a year and SCE (PS3 PSP PS2 PSN) is pretty close. 

And as I say, Ninty games are quicker and cheaper to make = allowing for more to be made. 

If you think Metacritic defines quality, you are really silly. Metacritic is a group of opinions, just as valid as anyone's. Without strict criteria you can't measure quality, it would be opinionated. So you can't say Nintendo brings out the highest quality of games, when although many agree, many think they suck.

So:

Sales - Nintendo wins by fact

Quantity - Close, with Nintendo having physical advantages on its side

Quality - Without strict criteria, it's down to opinion



Dr.Grass on 15 June 2010
leatherhat said:

 The ps3 beat the wii at E3, but the 3DS looks so good you have to give the overall win to Nintendo. They get an A, Sony a B, and MS a D.


This. Really hoped to be pushed to buy the 360 redesigned. Wasn't. At all.



Griffin on 15 June 2010

Nintendo had the worse conference out of all of them, Zelda looked half done in a rush art style in an empty looking world with dated graphics.  Metroid on the other hand just looks like a poor game overal.  Both of which games were announced last e3.  The goldeneye game just looked very bad, but i guess when the wii has no good shooters you are ready to jump on any FPS which wii owners do all the time.

The 2D side scrollers looked like something that might be worth $10 on the DS not full wii games.