Don't play those games with me, I won't give this up. You know what I meant, and don't try to spin it my friend.
We are supporting the the troops in wartime by funding the war they are fighting, ESPECIALLY if we are winning.
When we are not at war, the job is supposedly to secure America. I say "supposedly" because past Presidents have used them for other things that securing America. Such as Sending them to Somalia, and then after we lose a few pull them out as quick as we went in. Should we have gone into Somalia under Clinton #1? I don't know. Not that I can change any fact now. No one can. So since we are already in Iraq AND Afghanistan we must support the troops until those countries can secure themselves against infiltrating Terrorists. If that means a U.S. Friendly/Neutral Dictatorship in regions where personal liberty has never been known, then so be it.
I prefer people to choose freedom, but when people are not ready for it (most Islamic Countries) then we cannot force it on them. The Iraqi people have chosen freedom, it would seem. They are joining the side of the Allied Forces. They are rejecting the extreme view of the Koran (Read "literal interpretation").
We, the American People, will support the troops in Peace-time and war-time. The Troops duty is to protect America. By fighting this War on Islamofascism in Iraq and Afghanistan, they are keeping the front of the war off the soil of America. Thus they are protecting America.