These comparisons shouldn't be used as fanboy war bait, but more to show just how lazy these developers are when porting games. It's obvious the game is running on the same engine as GTA4 and after two years absolutely nothing was changed or improved for optimization on the PS3, that's it just lazy. What pisses me off is that fanboys start attacking each other instead of placing the blame where it belongs on the hands of the devs.

This is why I have started to shy away from multiplats, yeah the difference may be small but if i'm paying 60 bucks for this thing I want the same quality a 360 user is getting and no less.

This

Yawn, is it me or are these kind of threads boring. They both look OK and you have what you have. I am pretty damn sure it will not affect game play.

That does look slightly worrying, but I am going to survive with my PS3 version I am sure

Added TheSixAxis.com article to the OP..

More detail on what is missing..

It just goes to show that the multiplatform developers were right when they said the systems are relatively equal and that it really does 'depend' on how the game uses resources in determining which system comes out on top.

People are getting more value for money when developers make games to the strengths of the systems than when they make games which don't take advantage of the unique features in each.

If you want to know what a PS3 game looks like without SPUs being used, take a look at COD 2 on the PC which was pretty much at the limits of the 7900GTX at the time of release.

i guess if your use to killzone then you wouldn't notice the frame rate problems.

First off my PS3 version looks nothing like that crap it shows at night.
Secoundly, you must be really desperate to to feel better about your system if you really think those images show one console version looks better because there hardly is any. Isn't that a good thing?

Atleast it's nothing like Bayonetta.