By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - PS3 to surpass X360 in HW sales by March 2011

Infact I dont mind it if they defend their console since its their right. But they brought PS3 fans to the point were they admitted they would stay 3rd Place and said things like "I expect Sony to quit the buisness until 2010".


Infact Sony fans had to take a lot in the last years. And now PS3 has undeniably a big chance to overtake Xbox360. Thats the truth. I was teached on this site to accept PS3s third place. I think its time to make clear that at the moment it looks like the PS3s going to make the race and not 360. Since people made tons of calculations in the past years showing its impossible for PS3 to win so now I do my calculations.



Around the Network

Let this kind of topic end already, what is the point making any kind of comeback now? the market is already been determined. Everyone is going Multiplatform it make absolutely no difference which the console is at. Nintendo is #1 with their own way of the market, #2 and #3 both are sharing most of the same content from third party. You'll never see a PS2 senario rather the ps3 will pass the 360 or not. give this tired topic a rest and enjoy the fucking game on each console. if you love gaming just do what I do buy all 3 consoles.

Even I'm crazy about gaming I still will not pay a dime on that rotten Apple sign.



Netyaroze said:
Infact I dont mind it if they defend their console since its their right. But they brought PS3 fans to the point were they admitted they would stay 3rd Place and said things like "I expect Sony to quit the buisness until 2010".


Infact Sony fans had to take a lot in the last years. And now PS3 has undeniably a big chance to overtake Xbox360. Thats the truth. I was teached on this site to accept PS3s third place. I think its time to make clear that at the moment it looks like the PS3s going to make the race and not 360. Since people made tons of calculations in the past years showing its impossible for PS3 to win so now I do my calculations.


now thats impowerment! i've been on this site (not a member) for 5yr's and saw all of this. but becasue my coments where consider to be fanboy in nature. i wated until the moment i had nothing to argue when it came to the PS3 to become a member. (i read the rules and new i wasn't ready)



MARCUSDJACKSON said:
nightsurge said:

Halo 3 moved over 140k consoles in just the first 3 weeks after it launched.

And again you really are out of the loop aren't you?  The 360 didn't get a cut last year, and the redesigned 360 has leaked mobo photos, Steve Balmer leaked info, memory card removal and then flash drive support came out, etc.  It's pretty clearly getting a redesign.

Also, only a $50 cut for a 360 yet you fully support the notion that the PS3 is going to afford another $50-$100 cut this year?  That's pretty rich.  The PS3 automatically costs ~$80-100 more than a 360 to produce because of bluetooth, blu-ray, and wi-fi.  And yet they are selling for the SAME PRICE!  Once the redesign is done, the 360 could slash $100 off without even trying.  Then bundle in Natal for just a $50 increase.  The PS3 on the other hand, even if it gets a $50 cut this year, will cost $100 to bundle in Move with the console (if they do the full move which is controller + sub controller + eye + game).  They may leave out the subcontroller and bundle it for just $80 more.  Either way, prices this fall will be this:

 

These are my predictions.  Feel free to quote me on this:

Arcade 360 Slim - $149 or $99 (with Natal - $149 or 199)

Elite 360 Slim - $199 or $149 (with Natal - $199 or $249)

PS3 base model - $249 or $299 if no price cut (with Move - $329 or $349)

PS3 larger HDD model - $299 or $349 if no price cut (with Move - $379 or $399)

Wii - $149

i think some of those price points would spell doom for the agenda and bottomline for the big three! Microsoft is already lossing money on the arcade (read it somewhere but im not debating it/its probably not true). i see wii doing more of a $279.99 if they do a price cut at all. a slim 360 is likely but i don't think so. and a larger hdd PS3 would be stupid for sony. god i hope they don't.

a PS3 better not cost $329-$349-$379-$399 if they want sells to keep improving. that would just be going backwards in price, and would not make mutch sence. if they want to sell move! it should be priced lower then $149 if they want gamers that already have the console to buy move, and it shouldn't increase the price of a PS3 if they want to get those casual gamers.

and as far as im consernd. when it comes to move! if it doesn't have two motion controles and a sub controler. then its not worth buying. most of the games they've showed off needed two move controlers so it would make no sence to not include two motion controlers.

Just to clarify a few things.  I also don't think the Arcade 360 is losing any money. Probably at the break even/small profit range.  I believe my price points farthest left (in non-bundled) and farthest right (if bundled) are the more likely ones.

Also, when I say PS3 base model/larger HDD model I simply mean what they have now.  The 120gb is the base, the 250gb is the larger.  I figure they may update HDD size to 250gb and 320/500gb and since they don't have names for the SKU that was the easiest way to describe it.

As to your last point, that's why I see Move and this entire 15 million projection for next fiscal year to be highly overestimated and a huge problem for Sony.  Their bundles won't even be enough to play every game.  If they do include 2 controllers + sub controller that will drastically increase the price of the bundles.  They need to bundle the controllers with the console if they want to maximize install base, but if they do that their prices will be quite a bit higher looking.

It seems like an awful catch-22 that Sony is in.  They can choose to either take a huge loss per console sold and still bundle, or choose to sell the controllers separate to keep the initial console purchase cheap but hurt the install base of the new controllers by quite a bit, too.



nightsurge said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
nightsurge said:

Halo 3 moved over 140k consoles in just the first 3 weeks after it launched.

And again you really are out of the loop aren't you?  The 360 didn't get a cut last year, and the redesigned 360 has leaked mobo photos, Steve Balmer leaked info, memory card removal and then flash drive support came out, etc.  It's pretty clearly getting a redesign.

Also, only a $50 cut for a 360 yet you fully support the notion that the PS3 is going to afford another $50-$100 cut this year?  That's pretty rich.  The PS3 automatically costs ~$80-100 more than a 360 to produce because of bluetooth, blu-ray, and wi-fi.  And yet they are selling for the SAME PRICE!  Once the redesign is done, the 360 could slash $100 off without even trying.  Then bundle in Natal for just a $50 increase.  The PS3 on the other hand, even if it gets a $50 cut this year, will cost $100 to bundle in Move with the console (if they do the full move which is controller + sub controller + eye + game).  They may leave out the subcontroller and bundle it for just $80 more.  Either way, prices this fall will be this:

 

These are my predictions.  Feel free to quote me on this:

Arcade 360 Slim - $149 or $99 (with Natal - $149 or 199)

Elite 360 Slim - $199 or $149 (with Natal - $199 or $249)

PS3 base model - $249 or $299 if no price cut (with Move - $329 or $349)

PS3 larger HDD model - $299 or $349 if no price cut (with Move - $379 or $399)

Wii - $149

i think some of those price points would spell doom for the agenda and bottomline for the big three! Microsoft is already lossing money on the arcade (read it somewhere but im not debating it/its probably not true). i see wii doing more of a $279.99 if they do a price cut at all. a slim 360 is likely but i don't think so. and a larger hdd PS3 would be stupid for sony. god i hope they don't.

a PS3 better not cost $329-$349-$379-$399 if they want sells to keep improving. that would just be going backwards in price, and would not make mutch sence. if they want to sell move! it should be priced lower then $149 if they want gamers that already have the console to buy move, and it shouldn't increase the price of a PS3 if they want to get those casual gamers.

and as far as im consernd. when it comes to move! if it doesn't have two motion controles and a sub controler. then its not worth buying. most of the games they've showed off needed two move controlers so it would make no sence to not include two motion controlers.

Just to clarify a few things.  I also don't think the Arcade 360 is losing any money. Probably at the break even/small profit range.  I believe my price points farthest left (in non-bundled) and farthest right (if bundled) are the more likely ones.

Also, when I say PS3 base model/larger HDD model I simply mean what they have now.  The 120gb is the base, the 250gb is the larger.  I figure they may update HDD size to 250gb and 320/500gb and since they don't have names for the SKU that was the easiest way to describe it.

As to your last point, that's why I see Move and this entire 15 million projection for next fiscal year to be highly overestimated and a huge problem for Sony.  Their bundles won't even be enough to play every game.  If they do include 2 controllers + sub controller that will drastically increase the price of the bundles.  They need to bundle the controllers with the console if they want to maximize install base, but if they do that their prices will be quite a bit higher looking.

It seems like an awful catch-22 that Sony is in.  They can choose to either take a huge loss per console sold and still bundle, or choose to sell the controllers separate to keep the initial console purchase cheap but hurt the install base of the new controllers by quite a bit, too.

i know what you ment when you where talking about the base modle vs larger hdd. i was just saying that wouldn't be viable so we agree on something. realy i agree with all of it.



Around the Network

Sales bumps for sequels will be equal on both systems.

I think once Natal releases, there will be no more Elite standalone systems. MS has said Natal is like a "new" console release, so why sell your old consoles without the addon?

Selling Arcades makes perfect sense tho (banned consoles, RRoD, accidental death, etc). I doubt we will see an Arcade Bundle with Natal.

The biggest question for the 360 is Natal. Will it sell new consoles or just sell a lot of accessories? It will be successful to the current 360 crowd, but will it dominate new customers? I really do not know.

The biggest question for Sony is exclusives. Can they make up the difference? It will really come down to the Americas if Sony is to overtake the 360 by next March.



Natal will rock amongst one-armed gamers http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=109091&page=1, so if there are enough of them around the world, XB360 will win this gen.



Stwike him, Centuwion. Stwike him vewy wuffly! (Pontius Pilate, "Life of Brian")
A fart without stink is like a sky without stars.
TGS, Third Grade Shooter: brand new genre invented by Kevin Butler exclusively for Natal WiiToo Kinect. PEW! PEW-PEW-PEW! 
 


PS3 bigger than 360 before the end of 2011? No way.


Have everyone forgot the tick tock phase since 2007? 360 gets a cut in 2008, Sonys hurting in the spring of 2009. Remember the threads from that time, "PS3 dooomed".

Sony strickes back with a solid new hardware revision + a hefty pricecut. Back in the swing and now 1 year since "PS3 is doooomed" we see "360 is dooomed".

2010
Microsoft WILL launch a Slim version. Leaked hardware pcitures tells us before end of 2010. The Arcade SKU WILL be combined with the Natal (Arcade can push margins since it does not bear the heavy cost of HDD).

And never ever ever ever forget the Marketing power of Micrsoft. Look back at the hype of Halo 3, they made people belive that the game was created by god himself and the sales wher e huge compared with the istall base. Loads of games that had long history and equal strong names has been launched on both plattform, on a bigger install base, but none has come up in the same amount (but MW2 will soon).

The Hype that Microsoft is going to build around Natal will make presidents belive that it could save the worlds problems.

A Natal + Arcade slim will be the perfetct competition for Wii. Every day people do not need a hefty HDD, around 1gb internal NAND will do. The move to allow USB memory indicates that Arcade is the focus.

The pricepoint of Natal + Arcade will be good enough to justify to buy a new one a scrap the old one instead of buying Natal stand alone. Low price + new smaller design + Natal = success.

Sorry mate, PS3 will NOT pass 360 in 2011.



Predictions for 2009:

360: 39-42 PS3: 31-34 Wii: 67-70

Future projection

Wii will hit 100 million before christmas 2010 (made december 2008)

NDS Family will have sold and shipped more then PS2 at the end of 2009 (made january 2009)

hmmm ps3 sells about 130,000 every weeks and 360 sells 90-100,000 so .03 each week...



Netyaroze said:








But the problem is Europe and Japan just dont like Xbox as much as PS3 (except Uk). Sales there are shrinking. And if USA will peak for Xbox massively and Europe and Japan are at 2009 level then Xbox STILL will sell less then PS3. its just highly unlikely that Xbox can turn around the wheel.

The nearer PS3 get to 360 the more are 360 fans defending Xbox status.


I wonder when Xbox fans will admit that its over. Maybe after gap shrunk to 3 Million ?

They will probably never admit its over. Even if the PS3 passes the Xbox 360 it would have taken at least 4 to 5 years to achieve that. Many people are well past caring. It still doesn't stop the PS3 from being one of the biggest failures in the history of game consoles, probably only bested by Atari.

Yeah Xbox is able of good sales. But somehow people dont realize peak year Xbox 11 Mio Peak year PS3 13 Million until now. Even if PS3 peaked at 13 Million and it will sell every year less and less from now on. It would still beat Xbox360. If natal doesnt change everything its over. It has been over a long time for me since i knew if everything follows the rules it always do PS3 will catch Xbox360 sooner or later.

The scenarios for Xbox to win the race are not very likely: 

If PS3 has a mayor decline after September 2010 and will sell just under 13 Million lets say 12.5 Million and Xbox360 will be rescued through Natal and it will be mayor hit. So that Xbox360 will peak 2 years after its first peak. (Which hasnt happened before atleast idk any example for it). This would be the perfect scenario for Xbox. All other realistic scenarios point towards PS3. Xbox has to outsell its peak than ks to natal ny 1.5-2 Million units until march that would mean a mayor turnaround in Japan for Xbox360 (PS3 like sales) and exceed European PS3 sales and top USA sales in its best times and PS3 would have to sell  on 2008 level. But this wont happen never ever. Japan is totally lost for MS and this makes sure that the gap will diminish EU and USA could be the same for Xbox and PS3 but still they would loose because of Japan.

Xbox 360 YTD 2008: 2,116,359

Xbox 360 YTD 2010: 2,505,832

Xbox 360 total 2008: 10,885,116

The Xbox 360s sales are already higher than their peak years sales YTD. Since the majority of the events which would increase the Xbox 360s overall sales coincide with Q4 2010. The only important information is not the relative sales in 2010 but the rate of sales difference during the last 10 weeks of 2010 and going into 2011. We already know that the PS3 has sold extremely well at the start of the year, but the most important difference is always whether Xbox 360 > PS3 or vice versa.

I don't think you can count on Japan as being as decisive this year given the fact that Final Fantasy has already released and they will be getting one or two new handhelds. That leaves the U.S. which tips the scales at the end of the year with a slim majority of sales expected to fall in the Americas region.

Btw: We don't have official projected Xbox 360 sales do we? If the PS3 can do a 4th year peak as a third place console then thats unprecedented enough to say that the Xbox 360 could do a 5th year peak given its sales have remained relatively steady since release.

Natal is the only wildcard. But the effect of it has to he gigantic and tbh I really think everyone overestimates it. In my eyes Slim would have a far bigger effect on the Sales of Xbox360.

No it doesn't. A slim console would increase sales just off the novelty alone.

The Natal accessory only has to increase the base sales by a few million over a relatively short space of time to make a decisive impact. Remember the week after E3 last year the Xbox 360 got an increase of 20-30k sales just off the hype from Natal alone. Unlike Move the Natal interface has greater potential because it speaks to markets which are untapped by Nintendo and Sony probably won't even ask a question of them with their even more expensive Move controller that seeks to emulate the Wii.

 



Tease.