members of petroglyph was part of inventing rts. That's credability. Regardless. I have high hopes for both.. But End Of Nations seems to me the more interesting at this point. It does a lot of new things with the rts genre. Wether they'll work remains to be seen.
Regardless, there's only one MMO for me, and I don't care enough for RTS to check out an RTS MMO, sorry
So Guild Wars 2 is automatically more appealing to me wins ;D
there. Now it's more neutral :p
That's not really what I was going for
Probably not. But you have no way of knowing the quality of two games you haven't played. Just as I haven't. We can only guess at this point. Look at dawn of war 2. A lot of people claimed it was going to be great until it was released and turned out to be fucked. (according to what i've heard atleast.)
Probably not. But you have no way of knowing the quality of two games you haven't played. Just as I haven't. We can only guess at this point. Look at dawn of war 2. A lot of people claimed it was going to be great until it was released and turned out to be fucked. (according to what i've heard atleast.)
Aaawwwww, I just want to be a fanboy for a while...
Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."
Probably not. But you have no way of knowing the quality of two games you haven't played. Just as I haven't. We can only guess at this point. Look at dawn of war 2. A lot of people claimed it was going to be great until it was released and turned out to be fucked. (according to what i've heard atleast.)
Aaawwwww, I just want to be a fanboy for a while...
Yeah, sorry to beat you down using logic and stuff.. No seriously slap !.. Don't go to the fanboy side :p
I thought you knew better, don't copy that floppy.