Yakuzaice said:
I'm not even going to bother with the first 3 points because you still don't seem to understand I don't care about the development time comparison. I was just explaining how Uncharted 1 satisfies your issue with using Uncharted 2 as a comparison.
4. My entire point was you were fighting shadows with your comment about Gears. How can I tell you who said something when I felt your point was completely irrelevent and was a response to nobody? Seriously, you say you brought up Gears because I outlined Naughty Dog's release schedule before the first Uncharted. Why? What does Gears have to do with anything?
5. Let's look at how this conversation went. I made a short comment about how the development of the first Uncharted was almost identical to the second despite not being a sequel. A quality that you had stated contributed to a shorter development time. Then in response to this you make a completely dijointed post trying to transform this into some sort of system war (which admittedly might have been MikeB and Selnor's intent as well) rather than a comparison between two individual games. I respond asking what Gears, God of War, GT5, and Heavy Rain have to do with the development times of Alan Wake and Uncharted, and you pretty much say "well MikeB is trolling so why can't I".
So I suppose your point is you were trolling and it was a waste of time commenting on the fallacy that being a sequel shortened Uncharted 2's development time. Gotcha'
Though I will commend you for shortening the quote tree, I had meant to do that earlier.
|
If you don't care then let it lie. You tell me my point is irrelevant but ignore the PS3 owners comment? why?
All I am going to say is you clearly cannot comprehend this. It's beyond your spectrum so maybe you should drop it. I don't know how many more different ways I can explain the same point. You entered a discussion beyond you and now you are trying to save face. If you don't care so much don't respond.
I'll try one last time with one of the points though I suspect like all the other times it'll be over your head. You bought up games which no-one had mentioned before. You never explained why until several post later. So i mentioned games with similer dev times. Like I was asking MikeB to do. It turns out because you cannot explain yourself your point was the dev times of those games but of the studio, a studi bigger than remedy with more resources. Why does that point matter? You never explained it but I'm guessing I'm two post away from finding out finally.
Ok I read your last point and way to put words in peoples mouths. As you quoted me tell me where I said "well MikeB is trolling so why can't I". I never I said compare games with dev times like for like. You understand right? Apples and apples not Apples and oranges. You see fault with me asking him to be reasonable but not with his unnecessary comparisons? Blinkered vision maybe?
If you cannot see what my point was (if you absolutely have to then compare games with comparable dev times as I said to him and you many times so given your history of only understanding and explaining things several post later you might finally understand) then you should leave this right now before the headaches begin. Lord knows you've given me one. Maybe my comment about leaving the internet was aimed at the wrong person 
I don't think we need longer quote trees. As long as you don't think I'm deleting quotes to suit my argument. I'm not.