That game was at best a B-port. A good coding job at best. Certainly not great.

I can't really fault treyarch, since they did the best with the limited time and money. Activision is mostly to blame.

What would they reduce? They take out some tree's and make the levels smaller, make the AI stupid then you can get 30 fps, but your left with nothing like CoD 4 on the HD systems. Then you would have to deal with people complaing about it being a lame ass port, its completely different ect.

They kept everything the same, except the graphics. Same gameplay missions, same multiplayer. I know if i would want to play the game that people have been raving about, i would want the full game, not one thats "dumbed down".

It was a B-Port, they couldnt do an A port on the Wii because of its specs. You cant blame Treyarch for this only Nintendo and your selfs.

I doubt the next Call of Duty won't make it to Wii. It'll end up on most available platforms eventually. Call of Duty games are even still hitting the DS.

That being said, if for some reason it didn't hit the Wii, its not much of a loss.  Call of Duty isn't that great.

You clearly have no or little knowledge of gamedevelopment.

Please tell me how it's the customer's fault. PLEASE.

i gotta know what do some of you guys playing a Wii port of a HD game expect????? SOMETHINGS will be lost in translation, you will never have an exact replica of the game. The Wii is not powerful enough to do it. not to knock it but if you want to play the game as it was intended you gotta play it on the system the devs put the most work on

I actually never realized how Treyarch released their games on Wii. Weird. Infinity Ward just hates the Wii then.

OP requested lock

~locking~