Torillian said:
richardhutnik said:
Torillian said: Wow...you're tricking quite a number of people into thinking this is a legitimate review. Poor guys. |
People need to seriously know who the heck is saying what, and on what basis, before getting excited. I would also prefer people find reviewers they trust, rather than going with what Metacritic, or the X/Y score is.
|
y'know since we're on the subject, if I remember correctly you made this blog and I have to commend you for sticking with it, looks like you've put a decent amount of work into something I thought was just going to be a throw away joke at first.
|
Well, it was inspired by the whole entire Metacritic nonsense going on, so it morphed from giving everything 10/10 to actually having it as 11/10 to add a bit more value (I give an 11/10 if I really like something. I may like something and list the good points, and give it a 10/10). The point is to destroy Metacritic, and it still play the role of the fool. I am looking to add some other commentary in there, and have the pro's be relevant to stuff I like, but NOT be negative. So yes, I am keeping it around as a joke, with hopefully a bit more.
And I did get someone to do a 10/10 review for me out of Big Rigs. I will also look to update from time to time with stuff. I am not looking to do it daily, however. But, I will also look to do commentary that is more on the serious side. Who knows, maybe it will morph into something. But, I figured it was good to have a soapbox of a sort up. And I welcome people to reference whatever is on there, to mock they hype of fanboys and their Metacritic usage. I am also up for anyone who wants to write some guest reviews (hey, have a Youtube longer review? Well, this is a goes-to-11 is a place to reference it). The format is meant to be one of the laziest formats on the planet to do something.