Yeah, so, I'd made a thread on Specific Marvel Vs. Capcom 3 features, and, within 2 days or so, the thread had completely disappeared....  Everyone was always talking about how they wanted HD sprites (which we all know wont happen... even if hell froze over)  And, other people were talking about using the old sprites from ages ago... and then, others wanted a 3D game..

So, in my Marvel Vs. Capcom 3 thread, I suggested it be similar to MvC2.  2D characters over top of invisible 3D characters.  However, use pre-rendered 3D sprites, so, we get the same gameplay as 2D without sacrificing the look..  And then, for hypers, swap the 2D sprites for a 3D model, so we still get the dynamics of the SFIV hypers, and what-not..  Everyone wins... even capcom, because making 3D characters is faster than sprites..

....

So, my question is... Why would they remove it?  Was I onto something?  I also suggested being able to select 1, 2, or 3 characters, extended assist useage time (like TvC)  and, another meter that's used for counter attacks, for defending against long combos.  When you have more than one character, you can use the counter while being hit to swap characters, and the swapped character would simply block, if you were alone, and used it, you'd be put into an air-block state.

http://www.capcom-unity.com/marvelvscapcom/go/thread/view/55141/23062477/MvC3_idea_(not_specifically_character_related)

Original thread...

Do you think it was too close to how the actual MvC3 will be?  Do you like what I've suggested?  Please, no character requests....  That's not what this thread is about.

I dont exactly know if this is the case, but they probably removed it cause threads about MVC3 have been done 100x over. It aint gonna happen cause Capcom doesnt have the rights. Id like to see it but activision has the Marvel liscence.

And a Capcom-Activision alliance would be unheard of, especially since Capcom would get all of the glory out of it.

Actually the guy that was responsible for breaking SSFIV, it's roster, and all of it's features months before the official announcement just did the same for MvC3 and SSFIV PC. Usually when Capcom and/or Shoryuken.com delete a thread about a game announcement, it means the game his real.

http://teamspooky.com/content/?p=299

This proves it's real fake something.

Well when the delete the thread and ban the poster at Shoryuken. It's basically an official confirmation...

That makes no sense... Macros have been discussed far too much, and those threads are always locked, and, no, there's hardly any MvC3 threads that aren't about character wish lists...

The guy's SSFIV rumor was 100% accurate. So I'll consider it confirmed.

I think a new Marvel vs Capcom could actually help the Marvel brand. Like Sonic the Hedgehog, people stop caring after so many shit games.

I think MvC2 was rereleased to remind consumers a good game featuring Marvel characters actually existed. And perhaps that's motivating the creation of MvC3.

Love how you guys somehow managed to derail the topic...

But, Marvel Vs. Capcom 2 was re released because fans wanted the game. On every system it was on previously, it was considered a rare game, and, being rare, even though you're on four different systems is kinda bad. Also, the Xbox, and PS2 versions of the game aren't like the original Dreamcast version, minor differences in the game make it unplayable for most... Although, every combo I've tried works fine in every version of the game, so, it must be the magneto, sentinel, and storm infinities.. Anyway, the current versions are still lacking, and, in the new version, Blackheart has some new spamming abilities that puts him higher up on the tier list.

But, back on topic. We know Marvel Vs. Capcom 3 is coming soon. Do any of you guys think I was dead on with my suggestions? If you look on the boards... Yet another thread has been erased...

http://www.capcom-unity.com/marvelvscapcom/go/thread/view/55141/23107537/MarvelvsCapcom3_INBOUND!_to_be_announced_in_may!!!?sdb=1&pg=last#409277513

However, the other mvc3 board is up... Why don't they lock them like usual if they're a problem? They did it with the macro threads.