SpartanFX said:
selnor said:
Ping_ii said:
selnor said:
Ping_ii said: "If a game is rated higher for x console we will only list it for that console"....
Yeh because we all know having 1 point higher for a x version of the game even tho its basically the same game for both console means its better, the fanboy rules is full of fail. |
Um you will see the PS3 benefits from this to. It's a list for quality. There has to be some guage.
|
Uhhh I dont care if it benifits which ever console this logic fails so much no matter which way you look at it, why would you only list a game only for a certain console for having a point higher when their basically the same game for both platforms? Why is Darksider rated higher for 360 when its basically the same game in the ps3? why is borderlands? why is call of duty 5 rated higher for ps3 when its the same game for the 360? point is this rules are retarded.
|
Alot of reviewers review the same game slightly different. Fallout 3 for example performs better on 360 as does others. This effects the quality of the game and the reviews. Ifyou dont like it, take it up with the reviewers. Many of the games score higher and have more reviews to. It's catch 20/20. It's a quality list. Not a sort of what we think list.
|
as i said burnout paradise performs and looks better on PS3 but the difference comes from the number of reviews.So what do you have to say about that?
|
Mate you know that I own all the consoles, and that I have had some great experiences on the PS3.
But at some point you're going to have to straight out realise that by the most objective standard we have the Xbox 360 has more, better games in most genres.
Argue all you want about the importance of that, argue all you want about the value proposition of each console.
But fact is fact, and you should just let Selnor discuss it.