By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Which you prefer to be out of the video gaming race

 

Which you prefer to be out of the video gaming race

SONY 64 32.99%
 
MICROSOFT 48 24.74%
 
NINTENDO 20 10.31%
 
APPLE 60 30.93%
 
OTHERS (if theres any) 2 1.03%
 
Total:194
PhalanxCO on 04 April 2010

I think if we could just ban all PR, then the console "races" would be much more civil. That goes for all three companies.



Around the Network
Khuutra on 04 April 2010
Wagram said:
Khuutra said:
Wagram said:

Just because the games aren't in MY library doesn't mean other people in my home don't buy them. I have my own collection and so do they.

I suppose I will have to take your word for it, but you are not really making a case for yourself or for your experiences.

If anything I like Super Mario Bros Wii. But Galaxy makes me want to barf.

Two games in a generation is too much, eh?



gurglesletch on 04 April 2010

M$ because their products are crap like Windows Vista.




Get your Portable ID!

Aion on 04 April 2010

Sony, Apple would make a great system.



 

   PROUD MEMBER OF THE PLAYSTATION 3 : RPG FAN CLUB

 

dahuman on 04 April 2010

no Apple please......



Around the Network
Legend11 on 04 April 2010

Sony. I think it would have saved third parties a ton of money just developing for 360/PC and would have led to a new golden age for video games.



dahuman on 04 April 2010
Legend11 said:

Sony. I think it would have saved third parties a ton of money just developing for 360/PC and would have led to a new golden age for video games.

you want a golden age where everything looks the same due to middlewares? that's a hell of a thing to say. o_O



Legend11 on 04 April 2010
dahuman said:
Legend11 said:

Sony. I think it would have saved third parties a ton of money just developing for 360/PC and would have led to a new golden age for video games.

you want a golden age where everything looks the same due to middlewares? that's a hell of a thing to say. o_O


There are plenty of PC games that made the leap to 360 that didn't use Unreal Engine 3.  You can bet a lot more would if the installed base of the 360 was even larger.  I really think the PS3 is/was reponsible for a lot of the damage that third parties have had this generation.



dahuman on 04 April 2010
Legend11 said:
dahuman said:
Legend11 said:

Sony. I think it would have saved third parties a ton of money just developing for 360/PC and would have led to a new golden age for video games.

you want a golden age where everything looks the same due to middlewares? that's a hell of a thing to say. o_O


There are plenty of PC games that made the leap to 360 that didn't use Unreal Engine 3.  You can bet a lot more would if the installed base of the 360 was even larger.  I really think the PS3 is/was reponsible for a lot of the damage that third parties have had this generation.

actually, in this case, it's more that PC games got 360 ports a lot, only just recently have devs suddenly been alerted that they need to stop making shitty ass PC ports, in most cases anyways, not all.



mysticwolf on 04 April 2010
oldschoolfool said:
Wagram said:
Nintendo. They just don't do it for me anymore. I am so sick of Mario.


I could never be sick of Mario. Mario is the best.

That is so true



 Been away for a bit, but sneaking back in.

Gaming on: PS4, PC, 3DS. Got a Switch! Mainly to play Smash