By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - How it looks or how it plays? what makes you buy a game?

 

How it looks or how it plays? what makes you buy a game?

how it looks 10 16.13%
 
how it plays 52 83.87%
 
Total:62

if it looks like fun



"I like my steaks how i like my women.  Bloody and all over my face"

"Its like sex, but with a winner!"

MrBubbles Review Threads: Bill Gates, Jak II, Kingdom Hearts II, The Strangers, Sly 2, Crackdown, Zohan, Quarantine, Klungo Sssavesss Teh World, MS@E3'08, WATCHMEN(movie), Shadow of the Colossus, The Saboteur

Around the Network

Gameplay first, graphics later



Vaio - "Bury me at Milanello"      R.I.P AC Milan

In the 60's, people took acid to make the world weird.
Now the world is weird  and people take Prozac  to make it normal.

If laughing is the best medicine and marijuana makes you laugh

Is marijuana the best medicine?

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."

“If any creator has not played Mario, then they’re probably not a good creator. That’s something I can say with 100 percent confidence. Mario is, for game creators, the development bible.

The whole.

Of these two, gameplay comes first but horrible graphics could be a stop for me as well.



vlad321 said:

A person cannot be called a gamer if they answered with the first option.

 

 

This... games like n look nothing like U2, but they are still on my desktop for ages now



Vote the Mayor for Mayor!

There should be an option for both, I don't buy games that look like crap and I don't buy games that have rubbish gameplay. People keep saying how presentation doesn't matter, but then I remember how games like Okami, Heavy Rain, Ocarina of Time and Silent Hill would simply not work without their presentation.

I would rather play a great looking game with decent gameplay, than play pong, text RPG's and Donkey Kong classic for the rest of my life.



Bet with Conegamer and AussieGecko that the PS3 will have more exclusives in 2011 than the Wii or 360... or something.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752

Around the Network
Doobie_wop said:
There should be an option for both, I don't buy games that look like crap and I don't buy games that have rubbish gameplay. People keep saying how presentation doesn't matter, but then I remember how games like Okami, Heavy Rain, Ocarina of Time and Silent Hill would simply not work without their presentation.

I would rather play a great looking game with decent gameplay, than play pong, text RPG's and Donkey Kong classic for the rest of my life.

No it should not as it is about the choice between the two. If I put in “both” most people would chose that even I but then I asked my self what I want first and that is of course how it plays.

 

The poll won’t be fun then



    R.I.P Mr Iwata :'(

It depends on what game it is. If it's a gta type game,I want it to look really good. If it's a fps,it doesn't have to look top-notch.



Roma said:
Doobie_wop said:
There should be an option for both, I don't buy games that look like crap and I don't buy games that have rubbish gameplay. People keep saying how presentation doesn't matter, but then I remember how games like Okami, Heavy Rain, Ocarina of Time and Silent Hill would simply not work without their presentation.

I would rather play a great looking game with decent gameplay, than play pong, text RPG's and Donkey Kong classic for the rest of my life.

No it should not as it is about the chaise between the two. If I put in “both” most people would chose that even I but then I asked my self what I want first and that is of course how it plays.

 

The poll won’t be fun then

I guess your right, if everyone chose the same thing it'd be boring.



Bet with Conegamer and AussieGecko that the PS3 will have more exclusives in 2011 than the Wii or 360... or something.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752

How the game plays is obviously more important. However having said that our expectations of graphics are such that they should constantly be improving over time alongside innovations in gameplay.

To all those saying graphics don't matter you are obviously entitled to your preferences but why not have the best of both worlds??

Seems like some people here have it in their heads that gamers that love graphically impressive games only like and play them because of that. I know I wouldn't want to play a game if it didn't offer me a fun overall experience.



 

 

pizzahut451 said:
vlad321 said:
Seece said:
I find those guys saying (more or less) graphics mean nothing hilarious ... mainly because they're all fans of a certain console that doesn't posess great graphical power.

Graphics matter a lot to some people, a beautiful game can enhance your experience tenfold, bioshock wouldn't be nearly as good as it was without it's amazing graphics to create that amazing atmosphere.

People that shrug off graphics as if it's fact they add nothing need to just get off their high horse.

That is hilarious, because the machine I play on has graphics that makes the graphics of the machines you play on look like a Wii, literally.

System Shock 2 was an absolutely better game than BioShock as well. Even with its few polygons and everything esle, it was just a much better game.

Really? I play lots of games on PC and on consoles and the graphical diffrence is not half as big as it is on PS360 and on Wii. I dont know why are you trying to make consoles graphics look like shit compared to PC all the time. The only game that seperates PC from consoles is Crysis. Uncharted 2 IMO, looks better than 90% of PC games

It really really does. Not so much in pure polygon count, but in effects and textures, and just about everything else. Take that new Metro 2033 game. On highest settings I couldn't find pixelated textures unless they filled up half my screen and then the pixels were about the size of my toenail. On the 360 one pixel is as big as the entire screen. I will also never forget Garrus' armor from ME. Since they didn't push graphics and just made it to conform to the 306 just about everyone had extremely pixelated armor so when you talk to them it felt like you were talking to 8-bit characters. However Garrus was worth, especially that blue stripe he has on his face. It's just laughable how poor those things are on consoles.

To your other post, that's because you are a watcher and not a gamer.



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835