How it looks or how it plays? what makes you buy a game?

[vlad321]

pizzahut451 said:

vlad321 said:

Seece said:
I find those guys saying (more or less) graphics mean nothing hilarious ... mainly because they're all fans of a certain console that doesn't posess great graphical power.

Graphics matter a lot to some people, a beautiful game can enhance your experience tenfold, bioshock wouldn't be nearly as good as it was without it's amazing graphics to create that amazing atmosphere.

People that shrug off graphics as if it's fact they add nothing need to just get off their high horse.

That is hilarious, because the machine I play on has graphics that makes the graphics of the machines you play on look like a Wii, literally.

System Shock 2 was an absolutely better game than BioShock as well. Even with its few polygons and everything esle, it was just a much better game.

Really? I play lots of games on PC and on consoles and the graphical diffrence is not half as big as it is on PS360 and on Wii. I dont know why are you trying to make consoles graphics look like shit compared to PC all the time. The only game that seperates PC from consoles is Crysis. Uncharted 2 IMO, looks better than 90% of PC games

It really really does. Not so much in pure polygon count, but in effects and textures, and just about everything else. Take that new Metro 2033 game. On highest settings I couldn't find pixelated textures unless they filled up half my screen and then the pixels were about the size of my toenail. On the 360 one pixel is as big as the entire screen. I will also never forget Garrus' armor from ME. Since they didn't push graphics and just made it to conform to the 306 just about everyone had extremely pixelated armor so when you talk to them it felt like you were talking to 8-bit characters. However Garrus was worth, especially that blue stripe he has on his face. It's just laughable how poor those things are on consoles.

To your other post, that's because you are a watcher and not a gamer.