heruamon said:
STEKSTAV said:
heruamon said: Once again...Let's see the DIRECT QUOTE, because he's 100% correct, if he is talking about NA! I remebered how some said when PS3 dropped to $299, it would blow past Wii and 360...hmmm...it doesn't seem to be happening.
Why would Greenberg focus on Worldwide numbers? From launch, M$ has been concentrating heavily on making sure it can outsell Sony in NA and stay competitive in PAL, and it's doing just...this is a business, and you pick the battles and opportunities that have the highest ROI...this isn't a kid's competition that many on this site don't seem to get!
I'll put it in context...I'd like to see another company take 40% of market share from M$ in the software business, or 40% from Intel in the CPU business, and people not have a cow over that. M$ has done a phenomenal job in getting the Xbox brand as a viable, and PROFITABLE business unit, and htey did it by focusing on battles that they can win at...such as NA! |
WOW! Someone takes his console war seriously! Im a bit disappointed though.. theres no structured list on why something is better than the other. Shape up or ship out!
|
??? Errrr....okay...based on the quality of posting on this site (of lack there of), I'd rather just ship out!
|
Shape up as in "if your going to join the crusade of fighting for hardware over the internet, you need lists. Lists to why something is better than the other is the key to being a good soldier of the interwebs."
Ship out as in "if your not going to fight it out like a good soldier, then dont bother trying to killsteal in random posts whenever you feel like it. Get of the frontline and join the hippie movement."