Can somebody let this subject die already?
Rockstar: Announce Bully 2 already and make gamers proud!
Kojima: Come out with Project S already!
| huaxiong90 said: Can somebody let this subject die already? |
It probably won't, us PS3 fans really like to rub it in.
It seems like the vast majority of multiplatform games are superior on the 360 compared to the PS3 but when the odd ones does show up that is different talk about endless threads.
Imagine what a game would be like if it was built to the 360's strengths for four years and then given a three month rush PS3 port job, would it even be playable?
| Legend11 said: It seems like the vast majority of multiplatform games are superior on the 360 compared to the PS3 but when the odd ones does show up that is different talk about endless threads. Imagine what a game would be like if it was built to the 360's strengths for four years and then given a three month PS3 port job, would it even be playable? |
well we had discussions for all of those so why not for this???
| huaxiong90 said: Can somebody let this subject die already? |
It's such a rare thing, best to just let people have their day (or week, or month), it'll play itself out eventually.
What's laughable of course is that metacritic has the 360 version rated higher, still. Only by 1% but it's still higher, when the most objective analyses you can get in gaming all say PS3 is the better version. The main difference being the Edge review has only been attributed to PS3. It seems Edge sometimes reviews only 1 version of a multiplat and other times it reviews all versions (e.g. MW2 has Edge reviews on metacritic for all 3 platforms).
“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Jimi Hendrix
SpartanFX said:
well we had discussions for all of those so why not for this??? |
Not only that, but we have an actual example of the reverse in Bayonetta; while it wasn't unplayable it had some serious flaws, however it seems the patch has sorted things by and large and there is now very little difference. Maybe Bayonetta didn't have 4 years of development on 360, but it was still a very short, and shoddy port job. And I thought S-E worked on the 360 port for more than 3 months, I might be wrong.
“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Jimi Hendrix
Kreshnik said:
the only biased person here is you for thinking GOW3 deserves a perfect 10. it just dont.
both FFs look the same, except the PS3 version running at 720p and the 360 version at 576p. IGN gave the 360 version a 0,5 lower score for graphics, but the overall score was the same. |
Well considering GOW3 isn't out yet. Both of yous can't comment on weather it deserves a 10 or not and for you saying it doesn't deserve a 10 without playing it yet makes you biased.
| Mad55 said: because its only a slight graphical difference. Not content difference and really no difference in glitch's between both versions. Come on let it die man just play it and have fun. |
yeah they are good both good games, but people call the ps3 and xbox "HD twins " so for a big game not to be played in HD is quite a big thing and I dont think it will die so easliy
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
