93
88 - 90 : the demo being more reliable than the trailer
^^ The Demo
Had no magic
Had no battles on moving titans
Had no epic cutscenes
Had no major boss battle
Was not an indicator of the final game.
Meta - Anywhere between 90-95
I'd say 93-4, with everyone bitching about lack of "evolution" and innovation. It will get a lot of - points also for beeing so brutal.
MY HYPE LIST: 1) Gran Turismo 5; 2) Civilization V; 3) Starcraft II; 4) The Last Guardian; 5) Metal Gear Solid: Rising
94
Low end: 92
High end: 96
(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective 
| mOeR-rpGee said: 91.. alot of the same reason-- to much like previous games.. |
what r reviewers expecting?? new controls HECK NO? like CoD if they change the controls it wont be CoD anymore same with GoW why do they keep making a big fuss bout it? its a trilogy all of them need to have the same core controls...
Ghazi4 said:
what r reviewers expecting?? new controls HECK NO? like CoD if they change the controls it wont be CoD anymore same with GoW why do they keep making a big fuss bout it? its a trilogy all of them need to have the same core controls... |
Some reviewers are rather illogical. The general Metacritic consensus was that Crack in Time was too similar to its predecessor...
I'm not sure what they were expecting. The removal of guns? Because apparently, space travel, Constructo weapons and the Zoni weren't enough.
(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective
92 - reason too much like the previous two.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
