didn't MS say it would look better then KZ2? if I remember that correctly then this article makes sense and shows that MS once again did not do what they said they would.. however We don't know if ANY of those things is true and Halo:Reach has time to get better..


do I think it has a chance to beat KZ2..

lol hell no.. but coming close is already a major achievement.

 yet soo funny

And you know what REALLY sucks? Halo: Reach will end up outselling Killzone 2 by at least 2:1, and most people outside of the Playstation arena won't even know what Killzone is. So much for polygon count mattering in the big scheme of things.

Also, we need to see what the final build of Halo: Reach is like before we comment on this.

I am a huge graphic whore, but comparing a game that came last February to one coming later this year is just useless. And if rumors are true, a new Killzone will be annouced anyway. Halo has never been about graphics, hype and multiplayer is what Halo stands for.

SHUT THE FUCK UP

Or when killzone 3 releases.

This thread is silly. Everyone just needs to go back and read Rocketpig's post on the first page.

Well this was already evident, KZ2 is a technical masterpiece, it's going to be hard to top it.

I bet Killzone 2 has 72% less AI on screen than Reach!

Once again it proves more that people do not read.

Do I think you have a chance to go back and read the article properly and then disregard it like anyone with any sense?

Yes.

If not, I have another comparison to post for you. Im going to compare the polygon count of a Spartan soldier to an enemy in Killzone 2. Since then you'd fall under the sway of my incredible pictures you'd change your wording as say that Killzone 2 does not live up to Halo: Reach.