i love xbox360 said:
bobobologna said:
i love xbox360 said:
bobobologna said:
i love xbox360 said: all this talk about graphics is rubbish! good graphics dont make a game amazing if so then zillzone 2 would be 10/10 but its not, the facts are some of the best games this gen have come on the wii with the graphics not much better than those on the ps2, so stop going on bout crap halo reach will be good even if the graphics are poor |
Why is talking about graphics rubbish? I don't think anyone has said that Halo: Reach won't be a good game because it doesn't have good graphics, but I could have missed it. I haven't gone through all the comments because frankly, it seems like there are a lot of fanboyish remarks being made from both sides. PS3 fans seem to think that Killzone 2 will obviously be better looking than Halo: Reach, while XBox360 fans seem to deflect everything by saying "But does Killzone 2 have splitscreen?" and "But is Killzone 2 even a good game?"
|
i havnt played the game so i wouldnt say "is killzone even a good game?", but i just dont think that graphic has anything to do with good game, sm galaxy has average graphics and its one of the best games ever. i just dont think we should pay so much attention to graphic and with console has better frame rates blah blah! does it really matter at the end of the day if u like the game u dont care about things like this.
|
Graphics technology is interesting to a lot of people. It's like you are complaining about car enthusiasts for discussing what's under the hood of their cars. Who cares if my car can do 0-60 in under 6 seconds as long as it takes me to work, the grocery store, and back home?
|
well as the wii has sold more than the ps3 and xbox its doent interest people enough to make a differnece to what they buy
|
Now it's like you saying "Well the Camry sells more than Ferraris, who cares about Ferraris?"
EDIT: Anyways, I'm done posting here, this thread has been derailed, and it's pointless to continue.