I supported Resident Evil until 4 game out.

I liked 4, but, I hated it as a Resident Evil game.


Remake RE2 plz! :D :D :D

I think the only thing wrong with Biohazard 4 was the storyline that was not Biohazard Biohazard5  the story of Biohazard 5 was more like the older ones  but if they wont to do Action Horror do it like the Onimusha games they got the balance perfect. 

Resident evil 5 was the first game I skipped in the whole resident evil universe (on Sony consoles). I really did not like the direction that 4 was going, but it was not bad because the controls (at the time) were some of the best. They really need to go back to what made resident evil great. To me it was the mutation of 2 & 3. That monster that would just adapt itself and meet you at the end of the game--you are armed with a rocket launcher and a timer letting you know that if you do not kill this thing you are going to be "nuked" along with all the other freakin' monsters in this God-forsaken town. Man that never gets old (IMO).

I think they should keep the RE4 style game....but maybe make it a little scarier and not so much action

I really liked Dead Space and thought they kept it scary and the right amount of action (too bad Dead Space 2 looks like it is going towards more of the action side of the spectrum)

If it goes back to its horror roots Resident Evil goes back to day one buys, but as long as the games are like Resident Evil 5 the series will strictly be for rental purposes!

veteran RE players who have happen to play the series since day one have notice the driving force in RE0,1,REMAKE,2,3 and CV, was the T-virus/G/T-Veronica.the introduction of Las plagas or Oroboros or some kind, gave gamers "THE WHAT THE F**K JUST HAPPEN EXPRESSION"

bottom line the direction, the plot of RE5 was going in the wrong direction, Even mikami the brain child of the RE franchise said it himself that he dislike how re5 went:-

Speaking in a recent interview with Official PlayStation magazine, Mikami, who's now working on games with ex-Capcom studio Platinum Games, said that playing Resi 5 would "just cause me stress".

"I probably won't play it. I won't like it, because it's not going to be the game I would have made," he said. "It'll just cause me stress if I play it. I think it could be fun for gamers to play it, but not for someone who has developed Resident Evil games.

"If I see anything in Resident Evil 5 that isn't done well, I'll be angry!"

On number five's similarities to Mikami's fourth Resi, he says "that's fine, isn't it? I think Resident Evil 5 doesn't need to change the series, but Resident Evil 6 will have to reinvent the series with another full model change or else it won't be able to keep on going."

Mikami's current projects are a joint Suda 51 horror game with EA and an unannounced game for Sega.

Mikami calls working on two projects at once "difficult", "but I'm director on my game for Platinum Games and producer on the game for EA. So if Suda does his job properly, my workload will decrease."

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=202814

*IN REALITY MIKAMI WOULD RATHER CUT OFF HIS OWN HEAD RATHER THAN PLAY RE 5.

Resident Evil and Silent Hill are meant to be survival horror.
Damn to fps that ruined so many franchises this gen...

Iam sure alot of you have seen this lod clip of RE4,

this is how resident evil should have been, and this is what RE fans have been waiting for:-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWpEE_5pDzQ

sad but true

The thing about resident evil is that its always been an action horror game.

It had some BOO! scares but the game was a complete action fest pretty much from part 2 and moving forward. What made it scary was the controls and lack of infinite ammo.

What resident evil should do is offer some puzzles and take away some ammo and we are good...