| badskywalker said: Except that all the posts you point to as finger pointing (based on you making it bold) are literally just collected evience of the character after the shooter was identified. Also all of those appear to be taken from this thread which doesn't dicount what Rol said either about the Kirk thread getting locked, as again thats all from after he was identified and all the stated information comes from his family's social media accounts or released statements |
It wasn't 'evidence', they were wild speculations and borderline conspiracy theories to link him to some fringe alt-right movement even most Conservatives haven't heard of.
None of them were stronger evidence than the concept of 'why the hell would a right-winger shoot Charlie Kirk'?
That was enough to get the other thread locked, why have none of these people even been moderated, except two people who were speaking against them?
I'm not calling for moderation either. Just pointing out the blatant bias taking place.
As for you, you came here at first with a bad faith 'both sides' argument, when pushed, immediately took a clear side and want to talk about hypocrisy?
You are the hypocrisy you speak.
This thread is a den for hypocrites and sophists.
