By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
EricHiggin on 16 May 2025
Edit Thread
Hardstuck-Platinum said:
160rmf said:

"You don't need to listen..." proceed to give a say on this anyway. I remember not long ago when people were laughing over the rumors of the Witcher 3 being ported for Switch, claming to be impossible. No matter how scaleble the technology is nowadays, some people just want to close their eyes and ears to stick in their narratives

It's not the same. The CPU's in the PS4 and Xbone were so bad that the switch CPU wasn't that far away from it. That's not the case anymore. The PS5/XBS consoles CPU is about 3x faster than the Switch 2 CPU. It's not about opinions or narratives. A game designed to run on the CPU of the PS5/XBS will run at about 10fps in the Switch 2 and there will be no amount of optimisation that could save it. 

Yup. Jaguar cores were junk. They were basically mobile cores back then in terms of performance. Zen 2 cores absolutely crush Jaguar.

PS5 is going to break a sweat playing GTAVI. XBSS is going to seriously struggle. SW2 while respectable for a handheld hybrid, just isn't going to be able to do it.



PS1   - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.

PS2  - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.

PS3   - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.

PS4   - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.

PRO  -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.

PS5   - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.

PRO  -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.