By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
EricHiggin on 18 April 2025
Edit Thread
curl-6 said:
EricHiggin said:

You just keep reacting and adjusting after explaining how business supposedly works. Just like all these business decisions I've been pointing out that were poor and wrong that led to adjustments. Yet your point is that Nin is right and is doing what is right for their business. My point is that I think Nin got it a bit wrong, mostly just with some of the pricing. My point is based on what I feel is not only in the best interest of the gamers, but also Nin in the long run, and not selfishness.

I'd much rather see more SW2 units sold than SW1, vs only seeing around say, 100M sales, give or take. The more gamers the merrier, no?

Nintendo would know better than you or I what price point would benefit them most. 

You insist that they'd be better off at $400, but your conclusion seems to be based on vibes rather than any actual evidence since we don't have the necessary data to make such a conclusion.

Like how Nin knew best with Wii U? Or MS with XB1? Or SNY with PS3?

Nothing to back it up? How's the reaction to SW2 been? Nothing but glee and positivity? Simply take my money memes galore?



PS1   - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.

PS2  - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.

PS3   - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.

PS4   - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.

PRO  -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.

PS5   - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.

PRO  -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.