By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
UnderwaterFunktown said:

I still think developers/publishers should just set their price on a case by case basis instead of relying on industry standards, lower prices can also lead to more sales so it's about finding the balance for each title. Personally I could be convinced to pay $80 for a game like the Witcher 3, but there are many $60 games I feel would make more sense at $40. As for GTA if Rockstar wants to see what happens at 100$ be my guest, it will still sell but it won't be a decision free of backlash, and it's ridiculous to think that one super expensive game will "save the industry" particularly when it isn't in need of saving. Companies just need to realize that infinite growth is neither sustainable or necessary.

Yeah, I get ya. I'd pay a 1000 to be able to play The Witcher 3 if it was the sole copy left of the game but I regret paying full price for Metaphor refantazio, that game with it's ps3 graphics, smaller budget, smaller team, cheaply produced etc does not feel like a 70 euro game, it feels like it should be in the Robocop Rogue city AA type pricing at 50 euro.