pokoko said:
Oh, Battlefield! Yeah, Battlefield, THAT'S what we were talking about, wasn't it? Yeah ... no. We weren't talking about Battlefield at all. Were we? Do you remember us talking about Battlefield? No, seriously, were we talking about Battlefield AT ALL? Nah. Then why did you bring it up? What did it have to do with the conversation? Go ahead, I want to hear about it. And, yes, I've seen people talk about unrealistic beauty standards for Stellar Blade, though, amusingly enough, those comments stopped after IGN France had to apologize and it was revealed that Eve was based on a real model. "PLEASE don't support Stellar Blade. "The game's creator adds to this by expressing his desire to see characters much more beautiful than himself in video games, reinforcing sexist stereotypes and unrealistic beauty standards." And there you are being dishonest again. I talk about how you QUOTE people then change the subject but of course you leave out where I said "quote" and pretend that I'm talking about people bringing up different topics in the thread at large. Bloody hell. Stop it. |
Who in their right mind would do something unrealistic in a video game? Like seriously, get with the programming...
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.







