Chrkeller said:
Soundwave said:
The two of you gaslight the same Nintendo threads over and over again and actually prevent any kind of actual hardware discussion because it's bogged down by your spotty understanding of Nintendo's own history and personal tastes that no one cares about. No one goes into XBox Series S threads and takes over threads talking about their personal preferences on frame rate. Why is that? At some point, people just get tired of it and it's more than fair to call it out. Simple as that. Not all of us strictly play Nintendo games on Nintendo systems. Some of us do play 3rd party games on the Switch. Some of us are interested in discussing how those games might perform without being yelled down every third post that "it will just be a PS4! You're not allowed to be excited about anything but Nintendo games on it and I'm going to make sure you understand anything below 60 fps is unplayable!". We don't need to hear that opinion 50 times over and over again in technical discussions. |
I would kindly ask you to stop lying. I've said no such things. In fact I have said the opposite. I fully respect and support the opinions of others. I have made it clear my opinions are mine and mine alone. Want to talk performance? The S2 will be a 2050 with 10 gb ram (8 vram) and 102 gbps bandwidth (bottleneck). Third party games will be 720p to 1080p and 30 fps, low settings. Personal preference from there. I'm not convinced GTA6 will run on it. Same with the Series S to be honest. But most third party games will run, assuming third party puts in the effort. Both the gpu and cpu will be underclocked for battery and heat dissipation. And I think the dock is still a glorified video output because price is important to Nintendo consumers, $400 is guess. Anyone who wants a feel for the S2 and third party games. Grab a 2050 and play at the above mentioned settings. |
If the S2 is a T239 low clocked then series S will be much more powerful then the S2.
