By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
yo33331 said:
Kakadu18 said:

Bold: show me where you got that from, because that is bullshit. People buy the Switch for Nintendo games and/or because it's hybrid, not only because it's handheld.

You pull random numbers out of thin air and then call what others say bullshit.

I can't take you serious anymore.

Out of logic. Who will buy PS3 graphics system to play it on it's big 4K 60 inch TV in home when they have PS4 or PS5 in home ? With 4K graphics.

Well I am not saying literally no one. There will be some hardcore nintendo fans that may buy it for home use. That's why I said most of the people buy it for handheld primary. Some small percentage may use it as a home console.

And the bullshit is " special console " not anything other. What gives whoever it is the power to name something special ?

Okay I name all the consoles that passed 100M special and what ? or one of a kind. Those are very subjective things that everyone can call everything they want.

Does PS5 have Mario Kart, Smash Bros, Pokemon, Breath of the Wild?

Anecdotally I know way more people who use the Switch as fun casual gaming device with friends, than those who use it primarily as a portable. Nintendo also puts a heavy emphasis on this in their marketing. Trying to deduce the proportion of gamers who buy it for portability based on its spec doesn't really get you anywhere. In real life no cares that Mario Kart 8 is not in 4k.  

They already said back in 2017 handheld/console split time was like 50/50 and this likely varies wildly per game. The inclusion of Switch Lite gives more weight to the portable side, but then the appeal of the device amongst casual gamers for local multiplayer experiences, fitness games etc all lean more towards TV use. Bottom line is the value of each play style is probably still very balanced.