By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
vivster said:
Mnementh said:

Vietnam was attacked in all these cases and defended their country. The french part is the most complicated, but France invaded Vietnam to try to reestablish their colony, after Vietnam declared independence following the loss of Japan (which had occupied the country) in World War II.

I may not agree with the undemocratic regime in Vietnam, but that doesn't mean I need to depict the defense against imperial invasions as "killed some people that one time".

And I think it is unfair to say this reaction is deflection, then the post from haxxiy that was answered here is actually a deflection, because haxxiy didn't want to accept that Vietnam did well (and much better than most western countries) in defeating coronavirus. Why don't you point out his deflection?

I did not get the first part of what haxxiy was responding to. I just found it hilarious that he tried to defend his country by saying something completely unrelated. That's textbook deflection. I should know, because I'm German and every other argument is ending with "But we beat you in WW2". What he said sounded the exact same. And it also sounds like what a propaganda machine would teach people to say if someone criticises their great country.

Considering the limited freedom of speech and the seemingly quite successful propaganda I will be careful with accepting any COVID numbers coming from there, just like with China and the US.

We should be really careful in praising any dictatorship for whatever reason, even if it was justified.

As I said, there were multiple posts about the successful fight against COVID in Vietnam and haxxiy reacted by dragging other political aspects into the situation. Yes, you might see HoangNhatAnh reaction as deflection, but actually it was a short and snappy response to a post that wanted to deflect discussion about the methods of vietnam to completely unrelated issues.

For trust into the numbers... do you trust our numbers in germany? After the rules changed and you can't get a test even with direct contact with a proven infected person as long as you show no symptoms. Which is even more hilarious considering you still get the recommendation to quarantine. And to make it useless: the quarantine doesn't expand to your contacts, including other members of your household. The numbers from germany are highly untrustworthy.

But you always have other indications. An infection that isn't under control will spread further and it results in full hospitals and increasing death numbers. That thing you can't keep under covers for a long period of time. These things indicate indeed, that Vietnam is quite successful in fighting the virus. In summer western media also recognized this, I don't find any recent reports though:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RjDqEauJMU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDk9CW82puo

I also think it is quite risky to ignore everything a dictatorship does and not to recognize their successes. Because we can learn from them without turning ourself into dictatorships. But to learn from them, we first have to recognize what we can learn. By outright denying every success of such countries because dictatorship is actually not better than denying everything germany does because of WWII. And in the current natural disaster which is the pandemic, it is clear that germany critically fails to properly respond, while Vietnam is quite successful. We should recognize this and try to learn everythign we can learn, not switch to unrelated points. It is justified to discuss the vietnamese authorative regime, but probably not in regards to fighting the virus. There may be some measures that are not applicable in a democracy, but that doesn't mean everything they do is impossible for us to replicate (or even modify to fit for us).



3DS-FC: 4511-1768-7903 (Mii-Name: Mnementh), Nintendo-Network-ID: Mnementh, Switch: SW-7706-3819-9381 (Mnementh)

my greatest games: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023

10 years greatest game event!

bets: [peak year] [+], [1], [2], [3], [4]