2nd Gen Atari 2600 was released in 1977. Atari 5200 and Colecovision were released 5 years later (one year before the market crash). The only console in your list released "only" one year later was the Intellvision, and when you notice that the console was 50% more expensive (and 300 bucks in 1978 was REALLY expensive for a gadget), you can understand the result easily.
3rd gen Nes Was released in 2983 (so this 3rds gen console was a competitor of some of the 2nd gen consoles, go wonder why they failed so hard) while the Master System was released in 1985. But ok, let's accept that as a "win" for the weaker console.
4rd: Are you kidding us? In the 90s, we wanted a Neo-Geo. But the price was WAYYYYYYY to high. More than 3 times the price of a Super Nes and let's not even talk about the price of the games. At this point, they are not even in direct competition. For the SupergraphX, the price was also too high, and you had to buy several add-ons too. At this point, you could be explaining why a DS "won" against a PS3/Wii/X360.
5th: PS1 was released in 1994, 2 years before the Nintendo 64. But the consoles are so different (CD vs cartridge) and you don't even take that into account for the "power". What's more powerful, a Formula 1 or a Boeing 747?
6th: at least now the consoles are similar enough for the comparaison to make sense (at least for Xbox and PS2, the Gamecub was still an oddity). Again Microsoft released their console late and their marketting was already a disaster. But the PS2 was also marketted as a DVD reader, while the XBox required an external IR adapter. But ok, let's take it as a win.
7th: at least now we can talk. Yeah the Wii was the least powerful console, the prices were not so different and there wasn't an additionnal "bonus" (like a DVD player).
8th: if you start to bring the iteration launch really late ....
So yeah, if you release your console one year before the next gen AND are in direct competition with this new gen, you won't win the generation. Yeah, if your console is 3 times more expensive, you won't win the generation. Yeah, if your console lacks basic features, you won't win the generation. And we can add the marketting failure from Microsoft, when will they learn that a console is primary sold for, you know, playing games?
Oh, on a general topic note and the launch of the new Xbox is a failure, at least in Japan (nobody wants that console, and please moderators, this is a fact from the charts: 382 consoles sold in a week is a disaster) and Europe (there isn't much supply issue for the Series S and outsold by the PS4). The console is already behind the PS5 in the US, unlexx they can find some exclusives to make people buy their console, the ratio PS5/Xbox Series will be higher than the PS/XOne=2.33. The current ratio PS5/Xbox Series is already at 1.89 and the PS5 has huge supply issues.
Let me remind you what this all is about: @brute claimed that weaker consoles never achieved much. I just pointed out that the stronger consoles never won their generation before the PS4 came around.
Now, what you did is cherry-picking at it's finest to come to the conclusion that the weaker consoles didn't win their gen because they don't count for some ludicrous reason. Seriously, was that an attempt at trolling me? Because it very much felt like this to me.
Also, some things to consider:
the Master System is just a slightly upgraded SG-1000 from 1983, which by itself was already more powerful than the NES/Famicom. So even your argument that the Master System launched 2 years after the NES doesn't work anymore.
You come with the argument that a console that is stronger but 2 years newer doesn't count anymore. Then the SNES would need to be removed from the count too, since the Megadrive (I refuse to call it Genesis) released over 2 years before Nintendo's console. But since it won, you let it pass, otherwise your own argument would be invalidated.
Why are N64 and Gamecube out for being somewhat different in where their games come from (not CD or DVD, but Cartridge and MiniDVD)? You're not making sense here, apart from not finding any good argument to invalidate that they were stronger than their Sony counterparts of that generation.
@bolded: Nobody would claim that XS wouldn't fail in Japan, that was known from the start. It managed however to stay on par with the XBO, so there's that at least. But you completely fail to acknowledge here that the PS5 is also failing in Japan, so much so that the Wii U and Vita are both largely outselling it launch-aligned over there.
@italic: PS5 isn't the only console that has severe stock issues; the XS also does. In fact, Microsoft recently asked AMD to get more chips so they can produce more consoles, as they are also crippled by massive demand overload, just like Sony does. So let's see if the ratio still holds true in half a year when the stock issues should all be resolved.Last edited by Bofferbrauer2 - on 06 January 2021
The Nintendo eShop rating Thread: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=237454
The Steam/GOG key gifting thread: https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread/242024/the-steamgog-key-gifting-thread/1/