Jaicee said:
Yeah, China's initial response of suppressing information was god-awful! But they did get their act together eventually and indisputably have managed to drastically reduce the number of daily new transmissions in the country to like single or double digits where it had been in the many thousands. That's what I'm talking about! It's some of the successful steps that they ultimately took that I think we should look at. As to being oppressive, this whole experience is oppressive for all of us. Name one thing about it that isn't: the problem? The solutions? Anything? Major disruption of normal life is just factually the only way to address a crisis like this. It's also not like our own White House has exactly been honest and forthcoming about the seriousness of the outbreak either for that matter. You know good and well that Trump would have all those critical reporters and so forth rounded up and imprisoned if he could halfway legally get away with it. It's not like his instincts are any different. |
I agree. And I want to add, that this is an extraordinary situation, a state of emergency. In situations like this it is acceptable to temporarily restrict personal liberties, if it is helpful to save lifes. Important is, that the liberties are restored, once the situation has been overcome.
Also the measurements taken seem to have stopped the spreading of the virus in China. I fear if all is over, some countries might end up with more casualties than China does. And I am not accepting that this will be worth the liberties and the profits of companies.







