| BraLoD said:
The fact Sony still doesn't have a game with a 97 metascore while Nintendo can get it twice in a year is pretty telling. |
The fact that Kemco still doesn't have a game with a metascore >80 while Sony has tons of them (more than 20 anyways) is pretty telling. The reviewers just slamming 10s and 9s left and right for Sony games, just because they are from Sony, while games from Kemco get much more critical reviews, just because they are a smaller company that doesn't buy as much ads as Sony does. Totally unfair!
There are some people who claim some companies just create better games than others, but they must be wrong. After all if reviews are fair, all the games from one company should get to the same average as the games form another company. But look:
Kemco: average career score is 56
Sony: has 73, nearly 20 points more
Nintendo: has 76, so it is treated similarly to Sony
This means reviewers unfairly look down on Kemco-games while praising unnecessarily highly games from Sony or Nintendo.
