As the discrimination isn't made based on race it isn't racism. It is companyism. Also the term reverse racism is dubious, as favoring one group means really discriminating the others. So it's just plain discrimination and racism.
And we all learned back in '08/'09, that some random posts on the internet are irrelevant. It's sales which count. Looking at these I can see, that more polished Nintendo-games sell more than bug-riddled third-party. That means someone with low tolerance to glitches (aka Rol) only buys Nintendo, while someone with middle glitch-tolerance (aka Mnementh) buys both Nintendo and some 3rd-party.
What we also can conclude from sales numbers, is that people may not apply companyism (or reverse companyism), but they apply mean genreism. How in hell can FIFA sell more than Dragon Age (example chosen to avoid the company-marker, and polish and series-fatigue should be in favor of Dragon Age). The same for Mario Kart and Xenoblade. The losing games don't have less polish and looking at content they even offer more than the winning games. The only explanation is that the consumers at large have a massively unfair bias towards Sports games.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
