mZuzek said:
Despite being, you know, the most powerful handheld ever..? Still pointless, anyway. If anything, the Switch's (as well as the Wii's, and the DS's) success shows that being underpowered doesn't mean crap. I'm not sure why you're so hellbent on this silly point, when there's more than enough evidence that the Switch is a good bit more powerful than the Wii U, and it is most definitely capable of running at the very least the first Project CARS, and probably the second one too with enough sacrifices - I mean come on, they got fucking Doom running on it. |
The bolded is exactly my point. I answered on the post claiming the WiiU failed because underpowered while the Switch is significantly more powerful and therefore a success.
And my point is too, that most of games are scalable enough to run on most more or less current hardware - including WiiU. Doom only shows that scaling things down is possible. If the company expects enough sales to make that endeavour profitable.







