The truth about Nintendo

[Mnementh]

Zod95 said:

Mnementh said:

Zod95 said:

Spazzy_D said:
Just want to say, but graphically at least, the 6th gen consoles were pretty clearly Xbox > Gamecube > PS2 > Dreamcast.

PS2 was the most powerful console when it was launched. That is being cutting-edge. Otherwise, NES was not cutting-edge either.

WiiU was the most powerful console when it was launched. Therefore cutting edge.

No it wasn't. WiiU is 7th gen tech like X360 and PS3 and quite frankly it will never have games with better graphics than Gran Turismo 5 or Crysis 2.

You said PS2 was the most powerful console when it launched. It barely have beaten the Dreamcast, but that aside - you're right. But also right is, that the WiiU was the most powerful console when it launched. So you might define 'cutting edge' differently, but if you do it as you do for PS2, the same can be applied to WiiU.

This is obvious for what you do - you apply different measurements for different companies/consoles. Same about the money. Nintendo made long time profit, and you concluded the gamer get more investments for his dollar with Sony or MS. Now Sony makes profit on PS4 and Nintendo loses on WiiU, but you will not accept your own line of argument for current facts.