Is Miyamoto's take on new IP's right?

[kljesta64]

bananaking21 said:

kljesta64 said:

bananaking21 said:

kljesta64 said:
spot on. today new character equals new IP instead of new gameplay mechanics.

do you even understand what a new IP means?

yes. but thats not what we are talking about..todays gamers bash nintendo for not releasing new IPs wchich means creating new characters in a new world. take for example Super Mario 64 and Super Mario Galaxy. those games are completely different except its a jump n run game but if galaxy had a new character instead of Mario it would be called a new IP.

1.if we are going to talk about gamers bashing games we can go either way. i heard tons of people bashing the last of us saying its an uncharted clone when really the only 2 things they have in commen is the perspective of the camera and the characters uses guns. 

2.it also seems the case that nintendo facts act like all nintendo sequels are completely fresh and new. but that really isnt the case, bring up new super mario bros or donkey kong for example and they say that the gameplay is amazing and doesnt need changing, but these people willingly and happily bash games like CoD or assassins creed for being stale and the same, when actually assassins creed doesnt bring new gameplay mechanices with every game but it does keep its core gameplay similar. 

1. I think people are messing up genres and gameplay. comparing TLoU and Uncharted is silly.

2. yes thats hypocrisy. but still all those Mario games work even today. I think that is why people say such things and they just dont have faith in other games.