Mazty said:
If you think a single statement without an explanation is a valid reply, I hate to tell you it's not because I can just reply with "no you're wrong about that. And everything else. Ever." The fact I asked a few questions and you went ape shows that you obviously don't have good genuine replies for the questions I posed otherwise I would like to think, being a rational nice person, you would have replied with civilised answers over going nuts. |
You don't seem to remember your post. I repost it:
| Mazty said: Kid Icarus...how is this original? It's the same as ever with Nintendo. Japanese/kid-orientated games. The last Nintendo console that wasn't focused on such games was the N64, and yet to see something ground breaking from them. Where is their Gears of War, their Heavy Rain? SotC? DMC? They haven't done anything radical since SM:Galaxy. |
You state, Nintendo didn't do anything radical since SM:G, although I named three games. Remember, you didn't said they weren't original, you only 'asked questions', that is not stating facts, right? So your statement at the end is clearly wrong and you didn't do enough research.
And to ask you some question (remember, questions are not statements and cannot be wrong):
SotC? How is this original?
Gears of Wars? Is it another gory shooter?
Devil May Cry? How is that original or new? Guessing you haven't played Golden Axe?
Heavy Rain? Since then count action-adventures as new and fresh?
Remember, I ask only questions, so I cannot be wrong.
You shouldn't went ape shows, only because I showed you are wrong, you should take a heart and say: yes, in this case I was probably wrong. Nothing bad, everyone is wrong from time to time. No reason to be ashamed of.







