| LordTheNightKnight said: "It doesn't have to follow a "winning formula" at all. I can name a bunch of games that have took steps back on previous games in a series. GTA4 being a prime example, removing all the "fun" of GTA:SA, yet selling VERY well due to being called Grand Theft Auto." This is about people who looked at CW and decided they didn't want it in the first place. If the game disappoints people just looking at the marketing, there is something wrong. |
Gears 1 has excellent online. It was one of the most played titles on Xbox Live for a LONG time. Probably in the top 3, i can't remember that well... Gears 2 online promised bigger and better stuff. It had 5vs5, which was great, but was also a laggy mess. It was terrible. You couldn't get into a game without waiting 5 minutes to connect... Yet it still sold well due to the popularity of the 1st game.
Halo 2 to Halo 3 would be another great example. Halo 3 is vastly thought to be the worst in the series, yet it is also the best selling.
Modern Warfare 2 was bought because it was the sequel to the best FPS ever created ![]()
I can agree that the marketting was a big factor for it not selling so well.
![]()







