By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JEDE3 said:
Barozi said:
famousringo said:
ameratsu said:
Kenology said:

^ Sorry you missed it. It's archived on metacritic though... if you wanna have a look.


Give me a break. The Conduit was given the most coverage of any mediocre shooter since... Haze? Of course there were reviewers who hardly played the game and hacked together a review. That happens with every game, but your conspiracy theory that the gaming press is systematically underrating certain Wii games makes me call bullshit.

I'd say he has a case.

If you listen to the critics, The Conduit is barely better than Call of Duty 3, worse than Medal of Honor: Heroes 2, and way worse than Call of Duty: World at War.

If you listen to actual Wii users, it's the best FPS on the Wii, with the best user score of all four games.

I doubt it's a 'conspiracy' as you put it, but rating The Conduit between Call of Duty 3 and Medal of Honor: Heroes 2 is absurd, and only serves to further discredit game reviewers as professional journalists.

*yawn*

Fans of a certain game are always louder than those who think that the other game is slightly better.

I can remember when Resistance 2 came out all PS fans said it's the best shooter ever and 6 months later they say that the campaign sucked and that Resistance 1 was miles better.

I don't think anyone did that

What exactly ?

Resistance 2 best shooter ever or campaign in R2 sucks, R1 is miles better ?