What was wrong with killzone 2 compared to other successful first person shooters?
Please no short comments like "story sucks", "halo is better" or any of sorts.
What was wrong with killzone 2 compared to other successful first person shooters?
Please no short comments like "story sucks", "halo is better" or any of sorts.
Maybe it's not-COD-like control scheme put people off in the demo
Or the first half of the single-player has too many shades of grey
Or no co-op
Halo is 16+ (so all the kids can play it too :p)
Characters vere very boring and uninteresting.Also I was expecting more from Helghast as a "alien".
Take my love, take my land..
You hit the final rank online way to fast. I did it in under a week I think and I only player for 2-3 hours at that time, but there isn't something "wrong" with KZ2 I put a good 80 hours in the MP sure the story sucks but I didn't buy it for that.
I think in some scene where Helghast first spoke, they went going "Yea fuck that" or anything alike..I was so dissapointed.
Take my love, take my land..
Dude i have MW2 and I still cant abandon KZ2... Theres nothing wrong with it IMO.
hsrob said: What makes you think something is wrong with Killzone 2? |
Well, I hear quite a lot of people saying how killzone 2 was dull and uninnovative while they go on rambling about how other first person shooters are better. I never really understood that.
Simulacrum said: I think in some scene where Helghast first spoke, they went going "Yea fuck that" or anything alike..I was so dissapointed. |
I was also disappointed how the game profanes a lot throughout the game.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.