By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Gaming “Journalism” Gone Fanboy

Here is an article that discusses the situation of how "journalists" keep feeding the fire that cause fanboy riots. http://loot-ninja.com/2009/01/06/gaming-journalism-gone-fanboy/

 

Gaming “Journalism” Gone Fanboy

Gaming has become a remedy for cultural unison. It has broken down barriers of competition, communication, and entertainment; it has throttled our very own perception of evolving technologies and creativity. From Nintendo’s first console release in 1985 - which paved the way for console gaming as we know it - to our current generation of console diversity with Microsoft’s Xbox360, Sony’s PlayStation 3, and Nintendo’s intuitive Wii, gaming has become a luxurious means of expressive entertainment beyond our wildest dreams.

However, with this constant diversified genre of entertainment, groups begin to side with their console of choice and begin to perpetuate negative remarks (sometimes conjured stories) toward their console counterparts. This is where fanboyism and bad journalism comes into play. Where this one form of entertainment should be bringing gamers together but is, instead, driving everyone apart. These misleading stories and uneducated opinions are what continue to promote and instill this way of thinking amongst the more gullible of gamers. If the same opinion, or a lie, is constantly repeated and thrown around, it will, eventually, come to be taken as fact. And the cycle will continue to perpetuate itself.

Gamers tend to express negativity toward things that they are intimidated by. Whether it’s an exclusive title hitting the opposite console, or even an inspiring idea to widen user experience (NXE/Home); some journalists promote topics aimed at attacking a certain product in order to receive the attention they’re not getting. It’s a repetitive strategy that can always be seen on websites in order to promote attentiveness or to stir up an unrewarding fight amongst gamers. Sadly, this means of information is actually working and has thus created a two-sided culture in gaming rather than a single group that share the same hobby.

I’m personally tired of going to sites like N4G and reading ridiculous headlines that are complete lies just aimed at receiving hits. Titles like, “Microsoft and Sony to team up for the next-gen console” and the likes. Those are headlines that thrive in promoting unnecessary fibs in order to accumulate hits. The Internet has been transformed into a battleground of hate and despair amongst us rather than a haven for information and love for gaming. It has created small factions between us that instills hatred and lies in order to satisfy the unnecessary need to praise our console of choice. Things that shouldn’t matter to us, but do because our console is constantly being blatantly attacked by whomever. This constant debate of which console is superior to which, and what games are better than others, are all products of misinformation from sources who label themselves “journalists” and fanboys who get a kick from starting the latest flame war.

To those calling themselves “journalists” creating this misleading crap, stop already will you?  There’s no need to headline ludicrous material in order to promote yourself. You may have fans and those that are loyal will continue to read your material regardless of what you say (it’s how you say it). You keep posting bullshit and you will eventually lose any credibility you have and just become a joke (as some people already see you). Stop the marketing hype and bring news and solid original thought to the table.

N4G has become one of the many fanboy infested sites that spew nothing but hatred toward *Insert Console Here*. A site meant for sharing gaming news, articles and discussions that has become a haven for flame-bait. Where the ignoramus contently squat and await their chance to belittle anything or anyone that goes against their console beliefs. This generation of gamers resemble the religious fanatic. Where their belief is just, whilst others opinions and/or beliefs are completely omitted and not considered. The lack of open-mindedness has created a one-sided view amongst the newer generation that will just continue to follow the steep hill of ignorance. During the time when Nintendo and Sega were competitors, gaming was just… fun. It didn’t matter that I liked Sonic the Hedgehog and you liked Super Mario. It was just good old fashioned gaming at its prime. Where the media didn’t protrude into our daily lives and fed us the bullshit of NPD sales or Console A has better graphics than Console B. Consoles were there to provide us with a new engaging form of entertainment beyond the realms of Ping-Pong and Pinball machines.

I appreciate that gaming has become mainstream far beyond what was expected. I am grateful to live in an age where I am able to witness the transformation of gaming from its 8-bit origins to wherever it goes. I am grateful that I am able to discuss and communicate my hobbies with millions of others around the world who also share the same passion. For many, gaming has become a savior - a form of therapy to pry their minds away from the real-world bullshit that convolutes their daily lives. A form of entertainment that allows the millions of us to comfort one another through competitive gaming. Athletes have their sports, musicians have their instruments, writers have their pens, and us gamers have our gamepads. Everyone has something that makes them who they are. But the only difference is that I don’t hear baseball players calling their teams pussies for batting on the opposite side, or a trumpet player belittling a Clarinet player in their band for playing a different instrument. We all have our tastes, like and dislikes. Gaming should be done harmoniously and enjoyed by those who love it… What’s so good about shitting on a different instrument that’s capable of playing the same music?

Gaming has become too mainstream for its own good. Its fruits of entertainment have gone sour because of constant meaningless debates. Gaming sites have been congested with mobs of fanboys that refuse to become console neutral. All I know is that the few of us that are neutral will forever continue to savor the real fruits of gaming while fanboy retards will continue to relapse in the bitter taste of singularity. Where the only barriers that will hold us back is that of finances to support our habits. The real winners here are those of us who cherish gaming for what it is - entertainment. Open up, people. There’s no need to tattoo Sony, Nintendo, or Microsoft on your foreheads. And to you “journalists” who will, undoubtedly, continue to promote egregious journalism, you’re only spawning idiocy and humility on your end.

 

Awesome editorial on our current gaming culture....what do you guys think?



Explanation of sig:

I am a Pakistani.....my name is Dan....how hard is that? (Don't ask about the 101...apparantely there are more of me out there....)

Around the Network

I fully agree with the sentiment of this article, even if the author is looking at the past with rose-tinted glasses. Ah, to think of the number of playground arguments we had about Mario vs. Sonic...heck, check out the old Googlegroups topics on videogames: it's always been a man-baby run industry, and I'm hoping that this changes soon.



Meh. While gaming "journalists" are largely fanboys themselves, bitching about the internet is like complaining about the sun setting every night. People argue over preferences. It's human nature. Just step into a Mopar shop with a Ford t-shirt sometime, or walk into a Harley dealer with a Yamaha shirt and see what kind of response you get in real life. Then travel to the equivalent message board with that same shirt as an avatar and see what happens. Anonymity empowers people to say and do things they wouldn't dare do in real life.

As for gaming journalists, they're a joke. Not only because of their obvious preferences when it comes to their writings but also their lack of mature reasoning or objective thinking. By and large, they're a bunch of 20 or 30-something manchildren who would still wear underoos if allowed and seem to enjoy the same juvenile bullshit they did as a teenager. There are a few guys on Kotaku I enjoy (and would probably enjoy them more if they could properly grasp the difference between "its" and "it's"), but mostly, I just roll my eyes when I read something regarding the games industry.




Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/

That first pic looks fimilar.



Let me tell you something about gaming journalists. They are paid to big up their respective console and speak crap about other consoles.

I remember back in the days journalists would do just that and when they moved on and got employed on a rival console magazine they would simply speak rubbish about the console they used to support.



Around the Network
pakidan101 said:

It didn’t matter that I liked Sonic the Hedgehog and you liked Super Mario. It was just good old fashioned gaming at its prime.

You like Sonic?

*gasp*

That's it!  We must kung-fu fight!



I know that the past wasn't always free from fanboy rant, like Mario vs. Sonic....but it was much more playful compared to the way it is now.

I also know that journalists need to use shabby tactics in order to get people to come to their respective magazine/website rather than other opposing alternatives. However, it just seems to me that they are now crossing the line.

Maybe this is just true for the media world in general; instead of challenging our minds to decide for ourselves what is good for us or what is not good for us, they play towards the lowest common denominator to get the most readers.

I guess that is the sad reality, ain't it?



Explanation of sig:

I am a Pakistani.....my name is Dan....how hard is that? (Don't ask about the 101...apparantely there are more of me out there....)

Badassbab said:
Let me tell you something about gaming journalists. They are paid to big up their respective console and speak crap about other consoles.

I remember back in the days journalists would do just that and when they moved on and got employed on a rival console magazine they would simply speak rubbish about the console they used to support.

 

Lets simplify, "gaming journalism" doesn't exist. It is about consumer goods, this no journalism to me.



 

Evan Wells (Uncharted 2): I think the differences that you see between any two games has much more to do with the developer than whether it’s on the Xbox or PS3.

Sardauk said:
Badassbab said:
Let me tell you something about gaming journalists. They are paid to big up their respective console and speak crap about other consoles.

I remember back in the days journalists would do just that and when they moved on and got employed on a rival console magazine they would simply speak rubbish about the console they used to support.

 

Lets simplify, "gaming journalism" doesn't exist. It is about consumer goods, this no journalism to me.

Exactly.  Real journalism is about reporting facts, reminding people about history, exposing lies and the like.  Game "journalism" (as you rightly note it doesn't exist) merely regurgitates fanboy rantings and product whoring like clockwork.

 



In Memoriam RVW Jr.

SSBB Friend Code = 5455-9050-8670 (PM me if you add so I can add you!) 

Tetris Party Friend Code = 116129046416 (ditto)

Game Journalist's are like kids they crave attention but most people ignore them instinctively.