By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC Discussion - Spore is HORRIBLY overrated.

it is over rated but still a fun game and its getting lots of people into PC gaming



Around the Network

i guess it just has many problems, glitches etc. its the same case as gears of war, but the hype gets it an amazing rating, typical.



 

 

 

 

Any game that forces me to play for 4-8 hours to get to the "fun/good" part of the game is not worth it in my book. This is one of the main reasons why I cant stand most mmorpgs where it takes days if not weeks to get to the fun part of the game.



Proud owner of the following gaming devices:

PC, XBox 360, Wii, PS2, DS, PS3

 

thetonestarr said:
vlad321 said:
The whole creature creator part comes in the fact you can make anything that comes to mind and the game will figure out how to do everything with it. This is the part of SPORE that is literally ahead of any gaming technology out right now. So far models had to bed pre-programmed specifically for each type, but with this... it figures everything out by itself. Pure genius. I've actually enjoyed the game a great amount. The only things that annoy the hell out of me is the fact that in space stage your civ only has 1 ship and that's you while when you go to attack someone they have 50. Then again I am playing it on hard only so I have no idea what the other difficulties are like.

 

What are you talking about?? This is no different than the thousands of other "customization" games we've had for decades. You have a bunch of different parts, with some giving more points to certain stats than others. It's very simple programming, and nothing genius about it.

The only true difference is that where you put it on the creature can make it more or less effective for the creature... but that's not a significant difference either. It's pretty simple - mouth needs to be in the front, legs and arms are more effective when closer to the front as well, and when they're longer. Everything else (the spikes, horns, antlers, wings, etc) don't matter WHERE you place 'em, they give the same bonus either way. In the cell stage, where you place the spikes matters... but in the creature stage, it's entirely pointless. Put 'em wherever you want - the bonus is the same.

Again, I'm not saying it's not a good game. But better than anything else so far? Sorry, no. Not even close. I've played around with a mess of different creatures now, with a whole variety of body parts and configurations. So far, the same logic has existed for each one - place offensive body parts as far forward as possible, upgrade them as quickly as possible, and kill as much as possible. If I try going less "predatory" and instead make allies, that's a good deal more complicated, but the programming logic behind that's still been around for decades. I played DOS games with the same programming logic when I was a kid.

See your problem is thinking of what the actual customizatoin is in terms of what part does what and its bonuses. I'm talking about just outright making the damn thing move, eat, fight, walk, everything given the faact you have an infinite amount possibilieties. If you put the mouth on the back of the boyd ad everythign else in the front, it will till figure out how to make everything work without it looking broken. It takes some pretty mighty algorithms to get that stuff working the way it is right now. I've tried creating creatures to break the game and see some awkward ype of animations but no, not a single one. Whatever I do it makes it as if the creature was hardcoded specifically the way I made it.

 



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835

 

@shio's article. Since when do we need an article to explain us why we should like the game?



How many cups of darkness have I drank over the years? Even I don't know...

 

Around the Network
Godot said:
@shio's article. Since when do we need an article to explain us why we should like the game?

 

Ditto. If you need to understand the developers' rationale for making design decisions in order to like a game, then that's bad game design.



"'Casual games' are something the 'Game Industry' invented to explain away the Wii success instead of actually listening or looking at what Nintendo did. There is no 'casual strategy' from Nintendo. 'Accessible strategy', yes, but ‘casual gamers’ is just the 'Game Industry''s polite way of saying what they feel: 'retarded gamers'."

 -Sean Malstrom

 

 

So far I love it. And I just got to the civ stage. I'm going to be bold and make a sweeping generalization that alot of people will be too stupid to "get" this game. It's really quite brilliant.



You can find me on facebook as Markus Van Rijn, if you friend me just mention you're from VGchartz and who you are here.

@shio - See, there's the problem we're having. You're talking creativity, I'm talking technicality. The whole thing with making goofy placements work isn't anything complicated; it's just something that requires some creativity.

Which is the only thing Spore's got going for it - incredible creativity.

As Vagabond said, it is brilliant. But it's the concept and the ideas that are brilliant. The actual construction as a game is less so. It doesn't flow well, and frankly, with how little you actually see your creatures by the time you get to the Civilization stage, the argument of "creating a customized race which you have a degree of affection for" is null.

Like I said though, I expect these concerns will be entirely fixed with the next iteration.



 SW-5120-1900-6153

well, I got it today, hope you are full of crap



And that's the only thing I need is *this*. I don't need this or this. Just this PS4... And this gaming PC. - The PS4 and the Gaming PC and that's all I need... And this Xbox 360. - The PS4, the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360, and that's all I need... And these PS3's. - The PS4, and these PS3's, and the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360... And this Nintendo DS. - The PS4, this Xbox 360, and the Gaming PC, and the PS3's, and that's all *I* need. And that's *all* I need too. I don't need one other thing, not one... I need this. - The Gaming PC and PS4, and Xbox 360, and thePS3's . Well what are you looking at? What do you think I'm some kind of a jerk or something! - And this. That's all I need.

Obligatory dick measuring Gaming Laptop Specs: Sager NP8270-GTX: 17.3" FULL HD (1920X1080) LED Matte LC, nVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M, Intel Core i7-4700MQ, 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3, 750GB SATA II 3GB/s 7,200 RPM Hard Drive

My problem is not being able to find a planet when I'm given a quest for it. Very frustrating.



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835