o_O.Q said:
episteme said: I think thst there are some misunderstanding here. Hitler was anti-democrat and argued that democracy would lead to communism (so no private property). So business leaders should support his dictatorship to keep their property. Private ownership doesn't mean that there have to be free markets. |
"Private ownership doesn't mean that there have to be free markets."
i didn't say so, what i said is that private ownership means private control over business in this context, which was not the case in nazi germany
|
You view Nazi Germany without the necessary historical and cultural context. With your super strict view of socialism as "the government influences the economy and society" every single political party in the Weimar republic would have been socialist, even the 2nd German Reich would have been a socialistic state.
Did you watch the 2nd video I linked in the OP? You should watch it, it's a good video even if you disagree, and maybe you will learn a few things.