Cerebralbore101 said:
The only big-gun title that Sony released in 2000 for PS1 was Spyro. Insomniac has always been an independent studio though, so Sony had no control over when Spyro YotD released. PS3 was around for seven years, and that's without a mid-gen refresh. PS4 should also be a seven year system, especially because the Pro exists. Sony doesn't care one bit about MS right now. They've crushed MS this gen, and have enough big exclusive developers to crush them for years to come. Even with 360 launching a year ahead, Sony still waited to put out PS3. PS1 and PS2 both had six years until the following system, but that was in a different era of tech. |
SIE was a much smaller company back then, so it stands to reason they wouldn't be pushing as much then. And including 2005 absolutely works because Sony was going to absolutely launch in 2005. Unfortunately, they hit a snag in using two Cells (one as CPU and one as GPU), so they had to delay it a year to test a more conventional GPU solution. Had they not hit that snag, those games would have launched the same year as the PS3. And 5 big games next year doesn't mean much more when some, or all, could easily be made cross-gen, versus the 3 big games that launched exclusively for the PS3 in 2013.
And MS is ready to leave this gen behind. The are going to fail to sell even half of what the PS4 will. It's not like the XBO X sales are anything to write home about. They obviously are pushing hard for next gen, with all of the game companies they acquired lately. Hell, they even announced they have a next gen system on the way in June. I doubt they announced that, just to have people waiting around for another 2 1/2 years for the next Xbox.