Absolutely nothing about this is correct, but if we assume that this wasn't the ranting lunacy of a madman....

...then that's up to the New York Times. That's how this shit works. I wouldn't agree with it then, but if that's what the general public believes (that hating white people is okay), then sadly that's just what the public perception will be. I'm not saying that it's right, but if someone has that opinion and a host that supports them, I will simply chose not to support that host. 

Why is this so complicated for so many of you? 

Both the US or EU are big enough that any laws they impose on the internet will affect the world. The constitution can be amended and new laws made. I'm making an argument for freedom of speech laws to be extended to political speech on social media. The internet and social media didn't exist then but if it did, it would have been included under what's covered  with free speech especially with political speech.  The first amendment was created because we believe in freedom of speech as a principal and any laws created to protect it should be adapted to what's happening in the present.

Alot of businesses were regulated because they became integral to society. It has nothing to do with a monopoly in the way you mean that. They are important in how we communicate with everyone worldwide and recreating another social media that widely used or big is near impossible. I disagree with you on everything.

I didn't say you had to be religious to be crazy.  I said that if you are religious and crazy your craziness is another level of craziness.

Antifa is a fringe group and its not worse then any of the fringe groups on the right like the KKK and other hate groups.  At one point the KKK actually had substantial political power in the US especially in the deep south.  Plus they are far worse Antifa was and is.  Pretty much all the lynchings that took place in the US either was done by KKK members or was caused by KKK involvement. Also the worse case of domestic terrorism in the US the OKC bombing was done by a right winger.

I never watch much Alex Jones but it seems like him and InfoWars in general like to focus on facts, but sometimes go off on a crazy conspiracy theory.

So even if they're arguably correct most often, people will use the bullshit to discredit them entirely. But that's the risk of saying wacky shit.

Well at this point I think the average user of the most popular websites know they're incredibly bias and cater to popular left wing views.

People with opposing views will continue to use those websites though because they have a massive audience, essentially a monopoly. But fortunately services like Patreon allow people to support creators directly while YouTube demonetizes opposing views.

Anybody on the left who calls anybody leaning right as a bigot/Nazi/fascist are among the worst of the left.

The KKK isn't even relevant today and haven't been for a long time. Hence, we don't need to look to the past to make excuses for modern asshole.

Antifa is deemed a fringe group but their presence is much more significant than any other fringe group.

The worst you have on the left is some anti vaxxers that's about it.  Also the far left never mixes their craziness with religion but on the far right it is common that the craziest members are also religious and they mix their religion with their craziness.  That is why Alex Jones is on whole other level of crazy not only is a regular nut he is also a religious nut.

Anyone can walk into a Wal Mart or McDonalds, but if you think they're not gonna be booted when they start yelling at customers about their conspiracy theories, then you're sadly mistaken. How is facebook any different aside from it being digital? 

If you hosted a forum and someone joined said forum and were spouting the values of the KKK, would you ban them or would you shrug and go, "Welp, free speech says I have to let them say their things!" No, you wouldn't (Unless you agreed with that racist rant or your website was a KKK website...) 

Furthermore, if I walked into your house and started shouting at your kids about how we needed to eradicate the jews, and that their unwillingness to participate in cleansing was going to have the government send hit squads after them, you'd boot me right out your front door (and if you were American, probably shoot me). 

Facebook, Apple, Youtube, and any other internet website - no matter how easily accessed by the public or widespread or easy to get an account - are not obligated to allow anyone to use their platform to get their message out. If they decide they don't agree with Alex Jones and don't want him using their platforms to spread his beliefs, then that's their choice. Nobody's free speech is being trampled on because a platform holder decided to not allow their platform to be used to spread hate speech. 

I'm honestly quite shocked that there are so few people who actually understand this. What is so hard to grasp? Freedom of speech doesn't start and stop with racist rants and doesn't protect you from the consequences of what you say. If something you said makes a company not want to associate with you, then too bad for you. Shouldn't have said it.